| 
				
				 A federal judge in Manhattan has refused to dismiss a lawsuit 
				claiming that Woody Guthrie's classic 1940 folk song "This Land 
				is Your Land" belongs to the public. 
 In a Wednesday night decision, U.S. District Judge Deborah Batts 
				said members of Satorii, a New York band that recorded two 
				versions of "This Land," could pursue federal copyright claims 
				against two publishers that control rights to the song.
 
 Batts also dismissed several state law claims.
 
 Paul LiCalsi, a lawyer for the defendants Ludlow Music and The 
				Richmond Organization, declined to comment on Thursday.
 
				
				 
				
 The June 2016 lawsuit is among a series of cases by the lawyer 
				Mark Rifkin and his firm, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, 
				to move classic American songs into the public domain.
 
 These included successful quests to return "We Shall Overcome," 
				the civil rights anthem associated with the folk singer Pete 
				Seeger, and "Happy Birthday to You" to the public.
 
 "We look forward to returning another iconic song to the 
				public," Rifkin said in an email.
 
 The Library of Congress said Guthrie, then 27, wrote "This 
				Land," in reaction to Irving Berlin's "God Bless America," which 
				he thought glossed over wealth and land inequality in the 
				country.
 
 Satorii said the "This Land" melody was "substantially 
				identical" to a Baptist gospel hymn from around the start of the 
				20th century, known by such titles as "Fire Song." It also said 
				any copyright to "This Land" was forfeited several decades ago.
 
			[to top of second column] | 
             
				The defendants said Satorii lacked power to challenge their 
				copyrights simply because it paid a $45.50 licensing fee to 
				produce "This Land," including one version with a different 
				melody, and said it might owe another fee to make a music video.
 But the judge said the band realized it might be sued if it did 
				not pay the fees, making the payments involuntary.
 
 "Litigation over the song is likely to commence if and when 
				plaintiffs release version 2 or their music video without 
				obtaining a license to the disputed copyright," Batts wrote. 
				"Therefore, plaintiffs have standing to pursue their claims."
 
 Ludlow invoked its copyright in 2004 when it threatened to sue 
				JibJab Media Inc over its "This Land" parody video featuring the 
				main candidates in that year's U.S. presidential election, 
				Republican George W. Bush and Democrat John Kerry.
 
 That dispute was resolved, and the parody remains publicly 
				available. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8Q-sRdV7SY)
 
				
				 
				
 The case is Saint-Amour et al v The Richmond Organization Inc et 
				al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 
				16-04464.
 
 (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by James 
				Dalgleish)
 
			[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |