| 
		Republicans push easing U.S. Senate rules 
		to help Trump nominations 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [March 30, 2019] 
		By Richard Cowan and Lawrence Hurley 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans in the 
		U.S. Senate will attempt to alter its rules next week in order to 
		accelerate the confirmation of President Donald Trump's nominees for 
		some judgeships and sub-Cabinet level positions in his administration.
 
 Democrats, who control 47 of the Senate's 100 seats, have slowed the 
		confirmation of scores of such appointees.
 
 Historically, the Senate has provided more procedural protections for 
		the minority party than in the House of Representatives in the hope of 
		forcing more-reasoned legislating, and fostering compromise.
 
 But both parties over the last several years have complained that the 
		rules were being misused, leading to gridlock.
 
 Before they lost their majority control of the Senate at mid-term 
		elections in 2014, Democrats also took steps to speed up most executive 
		and judicial branch nominations by limiting the influence of the 
		minority party.
 
 Now, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell aims to stage a vote early 
		next week to reduce the time allowed for debating nominations from 30 
		hours to two hours.
 
		
		 
		
 "It would allow the administration, finally, two years into its tenure, 
		to staff numerous important positions that remain unfilled, with 
		nominees who have been languishing," the Republican leader said on 
		Thursday.
 
 Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer fired back saying, "This is just 
		another step in his (McConnell's) effort to limit the rights of the 
		minority and cede authority to the administration."
 
 If the rules change is made, it would apply to district court judges, 
		the lowest rung of the judiciary, and would not affect nominations for 
		vacancies in the Supreme Court and appeals courts.
 
 It would also not apply to cabinet-level executive positions and some 
		independent boards and commissions, McConnell noted.
 
 In 2017, McConnell changed the rules to make it easier to confirm 
		Supreme Court justices by requiring only a simple majority vote in order 
		to overcome Democratic opposition to Trump's first nominee, Neil Gorsuch.
 
 Initially, McConnell would need the cooperation of Democrats to win the 
		rules change.
 
		 
		[to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			President Donald Trump gestures towards the family of late U.S. Army 
			Staff Sgt. Travis Atkins, who sacrificed his life to save fellow 
			soldiers in Iraq in June 2007, as the president prepares to award 
			the Medal of Honor posthumously to Atkins during a ceremony in the 
			East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., March 27, 2019. 
			REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo 
            
 
            An aide to McConnell would not comment on whether Republicans would 
			employ a more partisan parliamentary maneuver to accomplish the 
			change - one that could be done without any Democratic support - if 
			his initial gambit fails.
 Despite McConnell's protests of Democratic intransigence, during the 
			first two years of Trump's presidency the White House has focused on 
			filling influential appeals court judgeships - nominations that 
			would not be subject to the rules change.
 
 (Click here to see a graphic showing Trump's appeals court 
			appointments: https://tmsnrt.rs/2Vxf9tL)
 
 Trump, a Republican, has so far won confirmation of 37 appeals court 
			judges in little over two years, including seven in the last month. 
			By comparison, Democratic President Barack Obama appointed 55 
			appeals court judges in the entire eight years he was in office. He 
			appointed 16 in his first two years, compared with Trump’s 30.
 
 For district court nominees, the lowest rung in the judiciary, Trump 
			has appointed 53 during his first two years in office, while Obama 
			won 44 at the same point in his presidency.
 
 Trump has also installed two Supreme Court justices, as did Obama in 
			his first two years in office.
 
 McConnell enraged Democrats in 2016 when he refused to hold 
			confirmation hearings or a vote on Obama's choice of Merrick Garland 
			to replace the late Antonin Scalia on the Supreme Court.
 
 
            
			 
			At the time, McConnell said that choice should be made by the winner 
			of the November 2016 presidential election, which turned out to be 
			Trump.
 
 (Reporting by Richard Cowan and Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Phil 
			Berlowitz)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |