Mueller complained to Barr about his
summary of Russia probe: Washington Post
Send a link to a friend
[May 01, 2019]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Special
Counsel Robert Mueller complained in a letter to Attorney General
William Barr that his four-page summary of Mueller's Russia report "did
not fully capture the context, nature, and substance" of the
investigation's conclusions, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.
The Post said it reviewed a copy of Mueller's letter, which was written
in late March after Barr released a summary on March 24 that said
Mueller did not establish that members of President Donald Trump’s
campaign conspired with Russia during the 2016 election.
Barr also said in the summary that Mueller had not reached a conclusion
on whether Trump obstructed justice. Barr said he and Deputy Attorney
General Rod Rosenstein had found the evidence insufficient to support
such a charge.
Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec, in a statement, confirmed
that Mueller wrote to Barr after the summary was released to express
frustration over "the lack of context and the resulting media coverage,"
particularly about Mueller's conclusions on obstruction of justice.
Democrats have accused Barr of trying to spin the report's conclusions
to protect Trump.
In a statement in response to the Post report, House of Representatives
Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler said Barr "should not have
taken it upon himself to describe the Special Counsel’s findings in a
light more favorable to the President." The Democratic lawmaker demanded
the Justice Department release a copy of Mueller's letter by Wednesday
morning.
Barr's four-page summary was released more than three weeks before a
redacted version of Mueller's 448-page report was released to the public
on April 18.
"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the
public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the
context, nature, and substance of this office's work and conclusions,"
Mueller wrote, according to the Post.
"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of
our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for
which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full
public confidence in the outcome of the investigations," the Post quoted
Mueller as writing.
[to top of second column]
|
Robert Mueller, as FBI director, testifies before the House
Judiciary Committee hearing on Federal Bureau of Investigation
oversight on Capitol Hill in Washington June 13, 2013. REUTERS/Yuri
Gripas/File Photo
Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller, declined to comment to Reuters.
Mueller asked Barr to release the report's introductions and
executive summaries quickly, without waiting for the full report to
go through the redaction process.
"Release at this time would alleviate the misunderstandings that
have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions
about the nature and outcome of our investigation," Mueller wrote,
according to the Post.
Kupec said after receiving Mueller's letter, Barr called the special
counsel and they had a "cordial and professional conversation."
Kupec said "the Special Counsel emphasized nothing in the Attorney
General’s March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading."
She said Barr declined Mueller's request to release part of the
report early, deciding "it would not be productive to release the
report in piecemeal fashion."
Mueller's letter is likely to be brought up when Barr testifies on
Wednesday about the Russia investigation before the Senate Judiciary
Committee. It will be the attorney general's first appearance on
Capitol Hill since the report's release.
(Reporting by Eric Beech and Karen Freifeld; Editing by David
Alexander and Peter Cooney)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|