Treatment guidelines in many countries recommend that doctors
perform a minimally invasive operation known as a laparoscopic
cholecystectomy to remove the gallbladder when patients have
abdominal pain associated with gallstones. But in non-emergency
cases, there's no consensus on how doctors should choose which
patients might be better off with nonsurgical treatments and
lifestyle changes.
For the current study, researchers tested whether patients with
gallbladder conditions being treated at outpatient clinics might
have better outcomes and less post-operative pain if surgeons
adopted a strict set of criteria for operating instead of the "usual
care" practice of operating at surgeons' discretion.
Researchers randomly assigned 537 patients with gallstones and
abdominal pain to receive usual care, and 530 patients to get
surgery only if they met five criteria: severe pain attacks; pain
lasting at least 15 to 30 minutes; pain radiating to the back; pain
in the upper abdomen or the right upper quadrant of the abdomen; and
pain that responds to pain relief medication.
Pain relief was no better or worse with the restrictive criteria
than it was with usual care. With both approaches, at least 40
percent of patients still had abdominal pain 12 months later.
But fewer people had operations with the restrictive criteria: 68
percent compared with 75 percent in the usual care group. This
suggests that surgeons need to rethink whether gallstone surgery is
necessary in every case and reconsider their criteria for
recommending operations, researchers write in The Lancet.
Patients should "be aware that there is a high chance that your
gallbladder operation will not resolve all your abdominal pain,"
said study co-author Dr. Philip de Reuver, a gastrointestinal
surgeon at Radboud University Hospital Nijmegen in the Netherlands.
"A good way to minimize unnecessary surgery is shared decision
making," de Reuver said by email. "Patients should make a list of
their symptoms and doctors need to tell which symptoms are most
likely to be resolved after surgery and which are less likely or
unlikely to be resolved."
[to top of second column] |
The main goal of the study was to prove "non-inferiority" of
restrictive surgical selection criteria as compared with leaving the
choice up to the surgeon. To prove this, researchers estimated that
there would need to be at least 5 percentage points separating the
proportion of patients who were pain-free one year after surgery.
With restrictive criteria, 56 percent of patients were pain-free
after 12 months, as were 60 percent of patients with usual care.
This difference was too small for the restrictive criteria to be
considered "non-inferior" to usual care.
There was no meaningful difference in gallstone complications
related to participating in the trial; 8 percent of patients in the
usual care group and 7 percent in the restrictive criteria group
experienced complications like acute gallbladder pain or
pancreatitis.
Surgical complication rates were also similar between the groups,
affecting 21 percent of patients in the usual care group and 22
percent in the restrictive criteria group.
At the end of the day, the study suggests that more work is needed
to determine the best criteria for selecting patients for surgery,
said the co-author of an accompanying editorial, Dr. Kjetil, Soreide
of the University of Bergen in Norway.
"Jumping to a cholecystectomy may not always yield good outcomes,
although many patients do still benefit from having a
cholecystectomy," Soreide said by email.
"One needs to be aware that this is not necessarily a 'quick fix' to
avoid disappointment after surgery," Soreide added. "Hopefully
further studies will give better insight to what might cause
symptoms and when a gallbladder surgery is likely to relieve
symptoms."
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2VqtWeq and https://bit.ly/2VoZocY The
Lancet, online April 26, 2019.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |