More contempt citations ahead for Trump
advisers: senior U.S. Democrat
Send a link to a friend
[May 11, 2019]
By David Morgan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congressional
Democrats, faced with blanket opposition to their oversight probes by
President Donald Trump, are considering more contempt citations against
administration officials who defy their subpoenas, a leading Democrat
said on Friday.
U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said lawmakers
may bundle numerous contempt citations from different committees into a
single resolution that the full House of Representatives could then vote
on.
"There obviously are going to have to be, perhaps from our committee and
certainly from other committees, other contempt citations to enforce
subpoenas," Nadler told reporters.
Asked about bundling citations together, the New York Democrat replied:
"It's a great idea. In fact, I suggested it ... It just makes sense, to
spend as little floor time as possible, to group them together."
A consolidated contempt vote is among options Democrats are considering
in response to Trump's stonewalling of congressional investigations into
his presidency and business investments.
Another option is reviving Congress's "inherent" contempt authority.
Some Democrats say that would allow lawmakers to fine uncooperative
officials up to $25,000 per day.
Some Democrats are also calling for impeachment proceedings against
recalcitrant Trump Cabinet members.
Nadler said Congress faces "the unprecedented situation in which the
administration is essentially stonewalling all subpoenas – we’ve never
had this before in American history, so far as I know."
His committee on Wednesday voted to recommend that the full House bring
a contempt of Congress citation against Attorney General William Barr
for defying a committee subpoena that seeks the unredacted Mueller
report and underlying material. The vote came just hours after the White
House blocked the report's disclosure by invoking the legal principle of
executive privilege.
But the judiciary committee chairman also sent a letter to Barr on
Friday, offering to resume negotiations for the Mueller material while
the contempt citation awaits a vote by the full House. "My staff is
ready, willing and able to meet with your staff in an effort to achieve
a suitable compromise," the letter said.
[to top of second column]
|
Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
listens to testimony during a mark up hearing on Capitol Hill in
Washington, U.S., March 26, 2019. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
Nadler told reporters that the House Intelligence Committee would
soon hold a contempt vote. Other Democratic lawmakers have suggested
action against Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin for refusing to
turn over Trump's tax returns.
He also reiterated plans to hold former White House counsel Don
McGahn in contempt if he does not show up to testify before the
panel under subpoena on May 21.
"He knows that if he doesn't testify on the 21st without a court
order, which he won’t get, he'll be subject to a contempt citation,"
the chairman said.
Nadler's committee is continuing to negotiate for Special Counsel
Robert Mueller, author of the report on Trump and Russian meddling
in the 2016 U.S. election, to testify before he leaves the Justice
Department in coming weeks.
"Hopefully he will come in. It won't be next week," Nadler said. "If
necessary, we will subpoena him and he will come."
The House Judiciary panel has not set a date for Mueller to testify,
but lawmakers had spoken tentatively about May 15. The panel is
still negotiating with Mueller and the Justice Department. It was
unclear where negotiations stood on Friday.
Barr has said he has no objection to Mueller testifying. But Trump
has tweeted that Mueller should not testify.
The Justice Department told the House committee that Mueller is
expected to leave his post in "a matter of weeks", according to
Nadler, who rejected the idea that there might a benefit to the
special counsel testifying as a private citizen.
"Is there a benefit? No! He may prefer to do that because he's then
more free from the instructions of the Department of Justice," the
chairman said.
(Reporting by David Morgan and Susan Heavey; Editing by Kevin
Drawbaugh and James Dalgleish)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |