First court test arrives in Trump-U.S.
House showdown over probes
Send a link to a friend
[May 14, 2019]
By Jan Wolfe
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A federal court for
the first time on Tuesday will step into the intensifying clash between
the U.S. House of Representatives and President Donald Trump, who is
stonewalling multiple probes led by House Democrats of himself and his
businesses.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington will hear oral arguments on
whether Mazars LLP, Trump's long-time accounting firm, must comply with
a House Oversight Committee subpoena seeking financial records for Trump
and his company.
In an aggressive response to congressional oversight, Trump is refusing
to cooperate with any of the probes. Their targets range from his tax
returns and policy decisions to his Washington hotel and his children's
security clearances.
The House Oversight Committee claims sweeping investigative power and
says it needs Trump's financial records to examine whether he has
conflicts of interest or broke the law by not disentangling himself from
his business holdings as previous presidents did.
Lawyers for Trump and the Trump Organization, his company, last month
filed a lawsuit to block the committee's subpoena, saying it exceeded
Congress' constitutional limits.
Trump's lawyers argued that Congress is on a quest to "turn up something
that Democrats can use as a political tool against the president now and
in the 2020 election."
On Monday, the Republican president's attorneys objected to Mehta's plan
to fast-track the lawsuit by holding a trial on Tuesday, saying that
would deny Trump a "full and fair" hearing.
Either way, Mehta will likely issue a written decision at a later date,
although he may indicate on Tuesday how he intends to rule. Whatever the
outcome, his ruling will almost certainly be appealed to a higher court.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump participates in the White House Iftar dinner
in the State Dining Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., May
13, 2019. REUTERS/Leah Millis
Mehta was appointed in 2014 by former Democratic President Barack
Obama, who was investigated almost non-stop by Republicans in
Congress during his two terms in office.
Mazars has avoided taking sides in the dispute and said it will
"comply with all legal obligations."
Trump's challenge of the Mazars subpoena was his first effort to
quash the multiple House inquiries. He has also sued over subpoenas
for his financial records sent to Deutsche Bank AG and Capital One
Financial Corp.
Some legal experts have said Trump's lawsuits are unlikely to
succeed. They said Congress has broad power to issue subpoenas, so
long as documents requested can help it legislate, and that courts
are reluctant to second-guess its motivations.
Some Democratic Party leaders have argued that Trump's stonewalling
represents a "constitutional crisis" and could force them to begin
impeachment proceedings to remove him from office, even though such
an effort would likely fail in the Republican-controlled Senate.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Dan Grebler)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|