The
ordinance, which also would require city departments to submit
surveillance technology policies for public vetting, can become
final after a second vote next week by the same officials, the
city's Board of Supervisors.
The action puts San Francisco at the forefront of increasing
discontent in the United States over facial recognition, which
government agencies have used for years and now has become more
powerful with the rise of cloud computing and artificial
intelligence technologies.
"We have a fundamental duty to safeguard the public from
potential abuses," Aaron Peskin, the city supervisor who
championed the ban, said before the board's vote.
Peskin said the ordinance was not an anti-technology policy. It
allows continued use of surveillance tools like security
cameras; the district attorney or sheriff can make an appeal to
use certain restricted technology in exceptional circumstances
as well.
Rather, Peskin said, the aim is to protect "marginalized groups"
that could be harmed by the technology.
For instance, Amazon.com Inc has come under scrutiny since last
year for selling an image analysis and ID service to law
enforcement. Researchers have said this service struggles to
identify the gender of individuals with darker skin, prompting
fears of unjust arrests. Amazon has defended its work and said
all users must follow the law.
Civil rights groups and companies including Microsoft Corp,
which markets a facial recognition service, have called for
regulation of the technology in recent months. This has added
momentum to the effort in San Francisco and to a parallel ban
reportedly in the works in nearby Oakland.
For a draft text of the San Francisco ordinance, see https://bit.ly/30jkPuJ
While communities at the heart of the technology industry are
moving to limit facial recognition, police elsewhere have
increased their use, primarily to spot potential suspects in
known offender databases after a crime has occurred.
U.S. customs agents are vetting foreign travelers at airports
with facial recognition, and other federal agencies use the
technology too.
Daniel Castro, vice president of the Information Technology &
Innovation Foundation, said concerns that the U.S. government
would use face identification for mass surveillance, like China
has, were overblown. The non-profit includes technology industry
representatives on its board.
San Francisco's "ban on facial recognition will make it frozen
in time with outdated technology," he said.
(Reporting By Jeffrey Dastin in San Francisco; editing by Bill
Berkrot and Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|