Trump, House Democrats square off in U.S.
court over Deutsche Bank documents
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2019]
By Brendan Pierson
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Lawyers for U.S.
President Donald Trump, three of his children and the Trump Organization
will demand in court on Wednesday that a judge stop Deutsche Bank AG and
Capital One Financial Corp from providing financial records to
Democratic lawmakers investigating Trump's businesses.
Republican Trump, who is seeking re-election next year, has aggressively
sought to defy congressional oversight of his administration since
Democrats took control of the U.S. House of Representatives in January.
Trump said last month that the administration was "fighting all the
subpoenas" issued by the House, hardening his position after the release
of a redacted report from Special Counsel Robert Mueller on how Russia
interfered in the 2016 U.S. election to help Trump and the president's
attempts to impede the investigation.
The contents of the subpoenas have not been made public. Wednesday's
hearing in federal court in Manhattan is scheduled for 2:30 p.m. (1630
GMT).
Deutsche Bank has long been a principal lender for Trump's real estate
business and a 2017 disclosure form showed that Trump had at least $130
million of liabilities to the bank.
In March, before issuing a subpoena, Democratic lawmakers asked Capital
One for documents concerning potential conflicts of interest tied to
Trump's Washington hotel and other business interests since he became
president in January 2017.
Deutsche Bank and Capital One said in court filings on May 10 they are
not taking a position on whether the subpoenas should be blocked.
Trump, his adult children, Donald Jr., Eric and Ivanka, and the Trump
Organization are seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent Deutsche
Bank complying with subpoenas from the House Financial Services
Committee and the House Intelligence Committee, and Capital One from
complying with a subpoena from the Financial Services Committee.
In a lawsuit filed on April 29, lawyers for Trump, his children and the
Trump Organization argued that the subpoenas were too broad, and that
Democrats are hoping they will "stumble upon something" that could be
used for political attacks on the president.
"The subpoenas were issued to harass President Donald J. Trump, to
rummage through every aspect of his personal finances, his businesses,
and the private information of the President and his family," the
complaint said.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump reacts as he speaks at the Wounded Warrior
Project Soldier Ride event after the release of Special Counsel
Robert Mueller's report, in the East Room of the White House in
Washington, U.S., April 18, 2019. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
The banks are the only defendants in the case, but the House
committees have intervened to oppose Trump's effort to block the
subpoenas.
"We remain committed to providing appropriate information to all
authorized investigations and will abide by a court order regarding
such investigations," Deutsche Bank said in a statement ahead of the
hearing.
Capital One declined comment.
Representative Maxine Waters, who chairs the House Financial
Services Committee, told reporters after the lawsuit was filed that
Trump had "cast a gauntlet." "We will fight him," she said.
Michael Stern, who served as senior House counsel from 1996 to 2004,
said in an interview on Tuesday that Trump and the other plaintiffs
faced an uphill battle. He said the judge was unlikely to look into
the committee's motives in issuing a subpoena "as long as it might
produce some information that's relevant to legislation."
On Monday, a federal judge in Washington ruled against the president
in a similar case, finding that Trump's accounting firm, Mazars LLP,
must comply with a congressional subpoena for Trump's financial
records.
U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta found that Congress was "not engaged
in a fishing expedition for the President's financial records when
it subpoenaed Mazars and said that documents obtained might assist
Congress in passing laws and performing other core functions.
Trump called Mehta's decision "crazy" and "totally the wrong
decision by obviously an Obama-appointed judge," referring to
Trump's Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama. U.S. District Judge
Edgardo Ramos, who was also appointed by Obama, is overseeing the
New York case.
(Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder
and Grant McCool)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |