U.S. officials seek to tamp down Trump
rhetoric on Iran
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2019]
By Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. officials who
briefed Congress about Iran on Tuesday sought to convince lawmakers that
President Donald Trump's administration wants to deter Tehran's
aggression, not attack the Islamic republic, members of Congress said.
"I hope they're tamping down (the rhetoric). They tried to give that
impression," Representative Eliot Engel, chairman of the Foreign Affairs
Committee, told reporters after the classified briefing for the full
House of Representatives.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman General
Joseph Dunford and Acting Secretary of Defense Patrick Shanahan held the
briefing after lawmakers, including Trump's fellow Republicans as well
as Democrats, clamored for weeks for more information about escalating
tensions with Iran.
The administration officials held a similar briefing, also behind closed
doors, for the full Senate later on Tuesday.
At the closed-door sessions, they spelled out to lawmakers what they
described as the imminent threat from Iran, or its proxies, to U.S.
personnel in the Middle East. Several Democrats said they were skeptical
about the extent of the threat, but Trump's fellow Republicans generally
agreed there was a heightened risk to Americans.
"There is no intention to go to war in the region. This is a deterrent
operation to stop Iran's escalation and aggression," Representative Mike
McCaul, the ranking Republican on the House foreign affairs panel, told
reporters.
After speaking to lawmakers, Shanahan said the administration does not
want the situation to escalate and that its actions to date had deterred
attacks by Iran on U.S. forces.
"This is about deterrence, not about war. We're not about going to war,"
Shanahan told reporters.
Pompeo, who has been an Iran hawk since he served in the House, made
only a general comment that the administration officials had discussed
their "strategic campaign" in the briefings.
ESCALATING RHETORIC
Tehran and Washington have been escalating rhetoric against each other
this month, following Trump's decision to try to cut Iran's oil exports
to zero and beef up the U.S. military presence in the Gulf in response
to what he said were Iranian threats.
Trump said the tightened sanctions were intended to push Iran to make
concessions beyond the terms of the 2015 international deal to curb
Iran's nuclear program. Trump withdrew the United States from the pact a
year ago.
[to top of second column]
|
Acting U.S. Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan, left, and U.S.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo speak to reporters after briefing
senators on Iran in Washington, U.S., May 21, 2019. REUTERS/James
Lawler Duggan
Last week, Washington pulled some diplomatic staff from its embassy
in Baghdad following attacks on four oil tankers in the Gulf.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on Tuesday rejected talks with the
United States, after Trump said Iran would call and ask for
negotiations "if and when they are ever ready."
After the Senate meeting, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said
they had told lawmakers the recent attacks on shipping and a
pipeline in the Middle East were directed by the Iranian government
and that U.S. officials had detected worrisome communication between
Tehran and a Shi'ite militia that prompted the military to quickly
relocate an aircraft carrier.
"They explained to us how the Iranian threat streams were different
than in the past, that the attack on the ships and the pipeline was
coordinated and directed by the Iranian government, the ayatollah,"
Graham told reporters.
Some House Democrats accused the administration officials of
twisting intelligence to make the case for what they see as an
aggressive response to any Iranian actions.
"In my opinion, there was not any information there that pointed to
any reason why we should be engaging in talk of war with Iran," said
Representative Ruben Gallego, a Democratic member of the House Armed
Services Committee.
Democrats also faulted Trump's administration for, as they put it,
lacking a long-term plan to deal with Iran now that Washington has
withdrawn from the nuclear agreement.
"They're just hoping that in the end the Iranians decide to come to
the table, without any clear plan on how that is going to happen,"
Democratic Senator Chris Murphy, a Foreign Relations Committee
member, told reporters.
(Additional reporting by David Alexander and Mohammad Zargham;
Editing by James Dalgleish)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |