Medicare, the U.S. health program for the elderly and disabled, pays
the entire bill for post-hospital care provided by skilled nursing
facilities for the first 20 days within a benefit period,
researchers note in JAMA Internal Medicine. After that, most
patients become responsible for a daily co-payment of more than
$150.
To see how the start of co-payments might impact discharge timing,
researchers examined data on more than 4.5million skilled nursing
facility discharges from January 2012 through November 2016.
Overall, a total of 220,037 patients were discharged on day 20, more
than the 131,558 sent home on day 19 and the 121,339 released on day
21. Compared to patients discharged on days 19 or 21, those sent
home on day 21 were more likely to suffer from multiple chronic
medical conditions, live in poor neighborhoods, and be racial or
ethnic minorities, the study found.
"Our results suggest that skilled nursing facilities are more likely
to discharge economically vulnerable patients right before their
copay kicks in," lead study author Dr. Paula Chatterjee of the
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in
Philadelphia said by email.
On day 20, for example, 12.5 percent of patients discharged were
black or Hispanic, compared with 8.2 percent one day earlier and 7.5
percent one day later, the study found.
And on day 20, 15.2 percent of patients discharged were living in
poverty and 7.7 percent were unemployed. These economically
vulnerable patients represented a smaller proportion of those
discharged one day earlier or later.
Most patients in the study had one or more chronic medical problems
like asthma or diabetes or heart disease.
On day 20, however, 42.2 percent of discharges were patients with at
least five different chronic health problems, compared with 39.9
percent on day 19 and 40.6 percent on day 21.
The study wasn't a controlled experiment designed to prove whether
or how discharge timing might impact patient health.
While day 20 may have been too soon for some patients to go home,
it's also possible that some people remained in skilled nursing
facilities through day 20 even though they were ready to leave
sooner, said Dr. Kumar Dharmarajan, chief scientific officer of
Clover Health and a researcher at Yale School of Medicine in New
Haven, Connecticut.
[to top of second column] |
"In some cases, it is likely that these individuals should have been
discharged earlier, but that the financial incentive to skilled
nursing facilities to retain these patients won out," Dharmarajan,
who wasn't involved in the study, said by email. "Unnecessarily long
stays in a facility can likewise increase complications including
falls and infections."
At the same time, patients more likely to be discharged on day 20
tended to fit the profile of patients who have had higher rates of
hospital use and repeat hospitalizations in other studies, said Dr.
Jennifer Goldstein of the Christiana Care Health and Sidney Kimmel
Medical College in Philadelphia.
"Those characteristics include male sex, African American race,
Hispanic ethnicity, low-income demographics and a high burden of
disease," Goldstein, who wasn't involved in the study, said by
email.
One limitation of the analysis is that it focused just on people
with fee-for-service Medicare who didn't have other types of
insurance, the study authors note. Many Medicare enrollees get
supplemental insurance or sign up for coverage through private
health plans or Medicaid.
Still, the results "raise concerns that patients are forgoing needed
medical care because of ability to pay, and/or that skilled nursing
facilities are selectively discharging such patients out of concern
patients will not be able to afford the copay," said Dr. Ann Sheehy
of the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health
in Madison.
"If financial reasons, as opposed to medical readiness, drive
skilled nursing facility discharge, this could negatively impact
health and safety for the most vulnerable Medicare beneficiaries,"
Sheehy, who wasn't involved in the study, said by email.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2EE1ECx JAMA Internal Medicine, online May 28,
2019.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |