Overdose victim's father to testify in
Oklahoma opioid trial of J&J
Send a link to a friend
[May 29, 2019]
By Nate Raymond
(Reuters) - The father of a university
football player who died of a drug overdose is expected to testify on
Wednesday on the second day of trial in a lawsuit by the state of
Oklahoma accusing the drugmaker Johnson & Johnson of fuelling the U.S.
opioid epidemic.
The trial in a state court in Norman, Oklahoma, in the first to result
from more than 2,000 similar lawsuits against opioid manufacturers
nationally.
The lawsuits by state and local governments seek to hold J&J and other
companies responsible for a drug abuse epidemic that the U.S. Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention says led to a record 47,600 opioid-related
overdose deaths in 2017.
Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter alleges that J&J, along with
OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma LP and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd,
carried out deceptive marking campaigns that downplayed the addictive
risks of opioid pain treatments while overstating their benefits.
Lawyers for the state claim that J&J, which sold the painkillers
Duragesic and Nucynta, marketed the opioids as safe and effective for
everyday pain while downplaying their addictive qualities.
The state claims J&J's actions created an oversupply of painkillers and
a public nuisance that will cost $12.7 billion to $17.5 billion to
remedy over the next 20 to 30 years.
[to top of second column]
|
To support its claims, lawyers for the state are expected on
Wednesday to call Craig Box, whose son Austin, a University of
Oklahoma linebacker, died of an opioid overdose in May 2011 at the
age of 22.
Oklahoma resolved its claims against Purdue in March for $270
million and against Teva on Sunday for $85 million, leaving J&J as
the only defendant in the nonjury trial before Cleveland County
District Judge Thad Balkman.
J&J denies wrongdoing, arguing that its marketing efforts were
proper and that the state cannot prove it caused the opioid epidemic
given the role doctors, patients, pharmacists and drug dealers
played.
The case is being closely watched by plaintiffs in other opioid
lawsuits, particularly the 1,850 cases consolidated before a federal
judge in Ohio, who has been pushing for a settlement agreement ahead
of an October trial.
Some plaintiffs' lawyers have compared the opioid cases to
litigation by states against the tobacco industry that led to a $246
billion settlement in 1998.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |