"For us, it's a big, big, big mistake. Because we have built the
safety of this industry on the single certification decision and
the mutual recognition and it has worked very well," IATA boss
Alexandre de Juniac told Reuters in an interview in Kuwait.
Some international regulators have said they plan to conduct
they own checks and not simply follow the U.S. Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) should it recertify the plane.
The U.S. FAA has traditionally taken the lead in certifying
Boeing aircraft, but two fatal crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia
involving the Boeing 737 MAX have sparked criticism of the FAA's
oversight and its close links with the U.S. planemaker.
"If you want to restore the confidence ... we need to come back
to this single, mutual recognition which has been so efficient,"
de Juniac.
Any changes to the certification process should be made jointly
and transparently by regulators, he said.
Otherwise, he said there was a risk that discrepancies could
emerge if regulators followed different procedures, making the
process more complex, increasing costs, and potentially less
safe because of the lack of unanimity.
Boeing’s top-selling jet was grounded in March following the two
crashes which killed all 346 people aboard.
Boeing is updating flight control software at the center of both
crashes. This must be approved by regulators before the plane
can fly commercially again.
The planemaker has said it aims to return the 737 MAX to service
by the end of 2019 after making software changes.
The MAX could return to service in Europe during the first
quarter of 2020, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
said on Monday.
(Reporting by Ahmed Hagagy, writing by Alexander Cornwell;
editing by Jason Neely)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|