The "misinformation" these centers offer typically includes limited
options for the next steps of pregnancy and unscientific sexual and
reproductive health explanations, according to a joint statement by
the Society for Adolescent Health and the North American Society for
Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology that was published in the
Journal of Adolescent Health.
These centers are "increasingly gaining government funding, support
and legal protections despite having secondary religious objectives
resulting in care and counseling exclusions that deviate from
scientific evidence and national standards of care," said Andrea
Swartzendruber of the University of Georgia in Athens, a co-author
of the position statement.
"Unfortunately, awareness about crisis pregnancy centers and the
limitations of their services seems low among the general public,"
she told Reuters Health by email. "The centers often hide their true
mission to attract people who might otherwise seek their services."
In the joint statement, the authors assert that these centers don't
adhere to medical practice standards for sexual and reproductive
health, particularly informed consent. They encourage federal, state
and local governments to be cautious with funding and to only
support programs that provide accurate, unbiased and complete
information about unplanned pregnancy, contraception, sexually
transmitted infections and all pregnancy options, including
abortion.
The statement also urges governmental regulatory boards and
accrediting bodies in health professions to monitor medical and
ethical standards of care at these centers. Beyond that, the authors
discourage school boards and administrators from outsourcing sex
education to these centers and urge companies with online platforms
to monitor how these centers represent their services through blogs,
social media posts and advertising.
Finally, the statement encourages health professionals, health
groups and health departments to understand and discuss the
limitations of crisis pregnancy centers and help young people
identify and access services with accurate, safe, evidence-based
care.
"Although individuals working in CPCs in the U.S. have First
Amendment rights to free speech, their provision of misinformation
may be harmful to young people and adults," the statement authors
write.
[to top of second column] |
"Crisis pregnancy centers receive federal funding. We must discuss
the medical and ethical standards of these centers as people can
view the receipt of government funds as an endorsement of sound
medical advice, yet study after study shows that CPCs routinely
provide misleading and inaccurate medical information," said Katelyn
Bryant-Comstock of IntraHealth International in Chapel Hill, North
Carolina, who wasn't involved in the position statement.
"Many crisis pregnancy centers actively target young people with
medically inaccurate information," she said by email. "Our tax
dollars are paying for services that are damaging to the health of
the population, and we need to be vocal about our concerns on what
bodies are funded to promote health care services."
To help the public and researchers identify crisis pregnancy
centers, Swartzendruber and a colleague created a map of the roughly
2,500 such centers operating in the U.S. (https://crisispregnancycentermap.com).
"The inclusion of CPCs on some state rosters of entities that
provide sexual health and pregnancy-related services may mislead
healthcare providers and others into assuming that CPCs offer
unbiased, comprehensive care," said Joanne Rosen of the Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, Maryland,
who wasn't involved in the position statement.
Sexually-active teens and young adults, who generally have limited
resources and power, should be able to access services that focus on
their specific needs and preferences, Rosen said by email.
"Pregnancy resource centers can help meet some of those needs, but
their resources and services are not enough, and they come with
strings attached," said Katrina Kimport of the University of
California, San Francisco, who studies reproductive health
decision-making.
"As the position statement shows, because they do not adhere to
medical and ethical standards, these centers cannot be part of a
reliable system of care," she told Reuters Health by email.
"Adolescents deserve better."
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2NoHvVZ Journal of Adolescent Health, online
October 28, 2019.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |