| 
		Indian court gives disputed religious site to Hindus in landmark ruling
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [November 09, 2019] 
		By Nigam Prusty, Suchitra Mohanty and Mayank Bhardwaj 
 NEW DELHI/AYODHYA, India (Reuters) - 
		India's Supreme Court on Saturday awarded a bitterly disputed religious 
		site to Hindus, dealing a defeat to Muslims who also claim the land that 
		has sparked some of the bloodiest riots in the history of independent 
		India.
 
 The ruling in the dispute between Hindu and Muslim groups paves the way 
		for the construction of a Hindu temple on the site in the northern town 
		of Ayodhya, a proposal long supported by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 
		ruling Hindu-nationalist party.
 
 Representatives of the Muslim group involved in the case criticised the 
		judgment as unfair and said it was likely to seek a review of the 
		verdict.
 
 In 1992 a Hindu mob destroyed the 16th-century Babri Mosque on the site, 
		triggering riots in which about 2,000 people, most of them Muslims, were 
		killed across the country.
 
 Court battles over the ownership of the site followed.
 
		
		 
		
 Jubilant Hindus, who have long campaigned for a temple to be built on 
		the ruins of the mosque, set off fire crackers in celebration in Ayodhya 
		after the court decision was announced.
 
 Thousands of paramilitary force members and police were deployed in 
		Ayodhya and other sensitive areas across India. There were no immediate 
		reports of unrest.
 
 "This verdict shouldn't be seen as a win or loss for anybody," Modi said 
		on Twitter.
 
 "May peace and harmony prevail!"
 
 Still, the verdict is likely to be viewed as win for Modi's ruling 
		Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its backers.
 
 It comes months after Modi's government stripped the Muslim-majority 
		Jammu and Kashmir region of its special status as a state, delivering on 
		yet another election promise to its largely Hindu support base.
 
 Neelanjan Sircar, an assistant professor at Ashoka University near New 
		Delhi, said the court ruling would benefit the BJP, which won 
		re-election in May, but a slowing economy would ultimately take centre 
		stage for voters.
 
 "In the short term, there will be a boost for the BJP," said Sircar. 
		"These things don't work forever ... Ram Temple isn't going to put food 
		on the table."
 
 Hindus believe the site is the birthplace of Lord Ram, a physical 
		incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu, and say the site was holy for 
		Hindus long before the Muslim Mughals, India's most prominent Islamic 
		rulers, built the Babri mosque there in 1528.
 
 'MILESTONE'
 
 The five-judge bench, headed by the Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, reached 
		a unanimous judgment to hand over the plot of just 2.77 acres (1.1 
		hectares), or about the size of a soccer field, to the Hindu group.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Policemen stand guard next to a security barricade on a street, 
			before the Supreme Court's verdict on a disputed religious site 
			claimed by both majority Hindus and Muslim, in Ayodhya, India, 
			November 9, 2019. REUTERS/Stringer NO ARCHIVES. NO RESALES. 
            
 
            The court also directed that another plot of 5 acres (2 hectare) in 
			Ayodhya be provided to the Muslim group that contested the case but 
			that was not enough to mollify some.
 "The country is now moving towards becoming a Hindu nation," 
			Asaduddin Owaisi, an influential Muslim opposition politician, told 
			reporters.
 
 Modi's party hailed the ruling as a "milestone".
 
 "I welcome the court decision and appeal to all religious groups to 
			accept the decision," Home Minister Amit Shah, who is also president 
			of the BJP, said on Twitter.
 
 The Sunni Muslim group involved in the case said it would likely 
			file a review petition, which could trigger another protracted legal 
			battle.
 
 "This is not a justice," said the group's lawyer, Zafaryab Jilani.
 
 Muslim organisations appealed for calm.
 
 The Hindu group Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh - the parent 
			organisation of Modi's party - had already decided against any 
			celebrations to avoid provoking sectarian violence between India's 
			majority Hindus and Muslims, who constitute 14% of its 1.3 billion 
			people.
 
 Restrictions were placed on gatherings in some places and internet 
			services were suspended. Elsewhere, police monitored social media to 
			curb rumours.
 
 Streets in Ayodhya were largely deserted and security personnel 
			patrolled the main road to Lucknow, the capital of the northern 
			state of Uttar Pradesh.
 
 Ayodhya residents were glued to their televisions and mobile phones 
			for news of the ruling, which delighted Hindus when it came.
 
            
			 
			"Everyone should come together to ensure that the construction work 
			begins at the site without any delay," roadside vendor Jitan Singh 
			said over the chants of "Jai Shri Ram" (hail Lord Ram) from fellow 
			shop-keepers.
 (Additional reporting Sankalp Phartiyal, Devjyot Ghoshal and Manoj 
			Kumar in New Delhi; Saurabh Sharma in Ayodhya; Kanishka Singh in 
			Lucknow; Swati Bhat, Shilpa Jamkhandikar and Rajendra Jadhav in 
			Mumbai; Writing by Rupam Jain and Alexandra Ulmer; Editing by Euan 
			Rocha, Robert Birsel)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |