While 7.1% of patients who took placebo pills died, had a second
heart attack, a stroke or needed a stent or heart surgery over the
next two years, the rate was reduced to 5.5% among volunteers who
took a half-milligram colchicine pill every day.
The reduction in risk with colchicine was seen even though patients
were receiving standard care with aspirin and cholesterol-lowering
drugs.
"Not only did we reduce first events and recurrent events, the drug
was well tolerated, the drug is well known, the safety profile is
well known, it is inexpensive, and it's widely available. So it's
only good news for patients," chief author Dr. Jean-Claude Tardif of
the Montreal Heart Institute told Reuters Health in a telephone
interview.
The results of the COLCOT study were reported Saturday at the
American Heart Association's annual Scientific Sessions in
Philadelphia and online in The New England Journal of Medicine.
The work also affirms earlier research showing that inflammation
plays an important role in cardiovascular problems.
"Twenty five years ago, people would look at atherosclerosis as rust
in the pipe," said Tardif. "We've learned this is not rust in a
pipe. This is a very dynamic disease."
"This is exciting because it's really telling us we have a major new
direction to go in the treatment of heart disease that goes beyond
cholesterol alone," said Dr. Paul Ridker, director of the Center for
Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at Brigham and Women's Hospital,
who has been studying inflammation for years but was not involved in
COLCOT. "This will open up this whole field."
He predicted in a phone interview, "We're going to be giving
patients very aggressive cholesterol-lowering and
inflammation-lowering treatment in the future."
Less clear is the value of giving colchicine to patients who haven't
had a first heart attack, even when they face a higher risk because
they have high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol or a
family history of heart disease.
Tardif said a study would be done to examine that question. Ridker
cautioned against giving the drug as a way to prevent that first
heart attack.
The treatment "does come with some risk. It does have an increased
risk of pneumonia," said Ridker, noting that pneumonia appeared in
0.9% of colchicine patients versus 0.4% in the placebo group.
[to top of second column] |
Colchicine is not prescribed for long-term use. "We have
overwhelming proof colchicine is safe and effective," in part
because it is widely used, he said. "But right now we're talking
about secondary prevention where the patients are at such high risk
we would accept the downsides. Colchicine's use has to be limited
unless we come up with a much safer drug."
"Whether (doctors) will decide immediately to not even wait for
another study and use it in primary prevention remains to be seen,"
said Tardif, director of the Montreal Heart Institute Research
Center and a professor of medicine at the University of Montreal.
The 4,745 volunteers, recruited at 167 medical centers in 12
countries, had experienced a heart attack within the previous 30
days. Patients with severe heart failure, a recent stroke, or
several other medical conditions were excluded. Only 19% were women.
The once-a-day half-milligram pill trimmed the odds of death from
any cardiovascular cause by 16%, reduced the likelihood of being
resuscitated from a cardiac arrest by 17%, shaved the chance of
subsequent heart attack by 9%, slashed the risk of being
hospitalized for coronary bypass or a stent procedure in half, and
cut the odds of a stroke by 74%. But only the last two outcomes were
statistically significant.
Thus, the lower rate of strokes, and the reduced need to go to the
emergency room to receive a stent or heart bypass surgery for chest
pain, accounted for most of the benefit from colchicine.
Colchicine, derived from the autumn crocus, has been around for
centuries and is cheap, at least outside the U.S.
List prices in the U.S. range from about $4.50 to nearly $7 a day,
according to the website goodrx.com.
However, "If my patient has an episode of gout, in Montreal it is 27
cents per day," said Tardif. "There is zero reason why anyone should
pay $5 or $7 dollars a day for a drug like this."
Both the drug and placebo groups had similar rates of side effects
during the study, and side effects attributed to colchicine were
few.
Besides the risk of pneumonia, nausea was a problem for 1.8% of
patients taking colchicine versus 1.0% taking the placebo and
flatulence was reported in 0.6% of the drug recipients compared with
0.2% among those on placebo.
SOURCE: https://bit.ly/2OdPjcp The New England Journal of Medicine,
online November 16, 2019.
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |