| 
			
			 As with the previous four debates, Wednesday's televised clash in 
			Atlanta is likely to be dominated by the intra-party battle over how 
			best to expand healthcare coverage to millions of Americans. 
 U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who has emerged as a top contender to 
			challenge Republican President Donald Trump, has faced criticism 
			from moderate rivals including former Vice President Joe Biden over 
			her Medicare for All proposal, which would eventually eliminate most 
			private insurance in favor of a government-run plan.
 
 In polling data made public on Wednesday, the nonprofit Kaiser 
			Family Foundation found 53% of Americans favored Medicare for All.
 
 However, two-thirds approved of a "public option" plan like that 
			proposed by Biden, Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana, and 
			other moderate candidates, which would offer a government plan to 
			compete with private insurance rather than replace it.
 
			 
			
 The nonprofit Progressive Change Institute, whose political arm, the 
			Progressive Change Campaign Coalition (PCCC), has endorsed Warren, 
			released its own poll on Tuesday showing that 66% of registered 
			voters nationally - and 63% in political battleground states - 
			support Medicare for All.
 
 The dueling data reflects the extent to which many Americans are 
			still fuzzy on Medicare for All's details, some strategists said.
 
 Democrats took control of the House of Representatives in 2018 
			powered by victories in moderate districts that were largely 
			credited to the party's disciplined messaging on healthcare. 
			Democratic candidates focused on Republican efforts to dismantle the 
			Affordable Care Act, thereby eliminating protections for people with 
			pre-existing medical conditions.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			That contrast has largely faded from the presidential campaign 
			trail, overshadowed by an extended back-and-forth over Medicare for 
			All and its feasibility. 
			Warren was attacked at the last debate for refusing to say whether 
			her proposal would raise middle-class taxes. She has since issued a 
			detailed plan asserting the overhaul can be paid for by taxing 
			corporations and the wealthy alone while driving down costs. Her 
			rivals have responded by saying that her assumptions are 
			unrealistic. 
			"It's a little bit of a mystery to me why Democrats want to carve 
			themselves up over health care, an issue they have a big advantage 
			on," said Drew Altman, president and chief executive of the Kaiser 
			Family Foundation.
 Some party leaders, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, have 
			warned that the focus on Medicare for All could cost Democrats with 
			swing voters next year.
 
 A separate Kaiser survey released on Tuesday of voters in the 
			presidential battleground states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, 
			Michigan and Minnesota found that more than 60% of swing voters view 
			eliminating private insurance as a bad idea.
 
 PCCC co-founder Adam Green argued that the public option polls 
			better because voters have heard about it for a decade. Green said 
			the ongoing debate over Medicare for All is a route to build broader 
			support.
 
 (Reporting by Joseph Ax and Amanda Becker; Editing by Colleen 
			Jenkins and Leslie Adler)
 
			[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |