Facebook can be forced to remove illegal content
worldwide, EU's top court decides
Send a link to a friend
[October 03, 2019] By
Foo Yun Chee
BRUSSELS (Reuters) - Facebook can be
ordered to police and remove illegal content worldwide, Europe's top
court said on Thursday, in a landmark ruling that rights advocates say
could allow authoritarian regimes to silence critics.
The ruling came just a week after the same court told Google that it
does not have to apply Europe's "right to be forgotten" law globally,
garnering praise from freedom of speech advocates as courts try and
figure out just how much responsibility for content platforms should
have.
The judgment by the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European
Union (CJEU) said Facebook may have to comply with requests to take down
content globally under certain conditions.
"EU law does not preclude a host provider like Facebook from being
ordered to remove identical and, in certain circumstances, equivalent
comments previously declared to be illegal," the Court said in a
statement.
"In addition, EU law does not preclude such an injunction from producing
effects worldwide, within the framework of the relevant international
law."
Facebook slammed the ruling, saying that it was not the role of social
platforms to monitor, interpret and remove speech that may be illegal in
any particular country.
"It undermines the long-standing principle that one country does not
have the right to impose its laws on speech on another country. It also
opens the door to obligations being imposed on internet companies to
proactively monitor content and then interpret if it is 'equivalent' to
content that has been found to be illegal," the company said.
"In order to get this right national courts will have to set out very
clear definitions on what 'identical' and 'equivalent' means in
practice. We hope the courts take a proportionate and measured approach,
to avoid having a chilling effect on freedom of expression."
UK rights group Article 19 backed Facebook, saying that it could impact
online freedom of expression worldwide.
[to top of second column] |
A 3-D printed Facebook
logo is seen in front of displayed binary code in this illustration
picture, June 18, 2019. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
"Compelling social media platforms like Facebook to automatically remove posts
regardless of their context will infringe our right to free speech and restrict
the information we see online," its executive director Thomas Hughes said.
He said it could lead to cases where a court in one country demands the removal
of social media posts in another country even if these are not illegal in that
country.
"This would set a dangerous precedent where the courts of one country can
control what internet users in another country can see. This could be open to
abuse, particularly by regimes with weak human rights records," he said.
The European Commission said the ruling was limited to court orders and doesn't
concern any other forms of notice by users alleging that certain content is
illegal.
Facebook found itself in the dock after Eva Glawisching-Piesczek, chairwoman of
the Greens parliamentary group in Austria, sued the company in an Austrian
court, asking that it delete a comment posted by a user that she said undermined
her honor, and also to remove identical claims.
The Austrian court subsequently sought guidance from the CJEU.
The case is C-18/18 Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland Limited
(Reporting By Jan Strupczewski; editing by John Stonestreet and Elaine
Hardcastle)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|