Editor Lionel Barber, in an email to staff, said the two-month
probe by law firm RPC had found that "the evidence does not
support claims of collusion between FT investigative reporters
and investors trading in Wirecard".
No comment was immediately available from Wirecard, a
Munich-based fintech that was last year admitted to Germany's
DAX blue-chip share index.
Barber called in RPC after German newspaper Handelsblatt
reported on July 21 that Wirecard had given evidence to German
prosecutors of suspected collusion between short sellers seeking
to profit from share-price falls and FT staff.
"I am satisfied that there is no foundation to support the
allegations of collusion leveled against our reporters by
Wirecard," Barber wrote in the email to staff seen by Reuters.
"We stand by our journalism."
FT reporter Dan McCrum has this year published a series of
investigative reports into Wirecard that, citing evidence from
whistleblowers, allege financial and accounting irregularities
at entities the company controls in Asia and the Middle East.
His first piece at the end of January, alleging fraud and
creative accounting at Wirecard's Singapore office, wiped up to
$10 billion off the fintech's stock market value and triggered a
police investigation in the Asian city-state.
Wirecard denies the allegations and has filed a suit at the
Munich regional court against both the FT and McCrum, seeking a
ruling on the merits of its case. If it wins that case, Wirecard
says it would seek financial redress.
The Munich public prosecutor, acting on a complaint by financial
regulator Bafin, is meanwhile investigating suspected
manipulation in Wirecard stock. According to sources close to
the investigation, McCrum is named as a suspect.
(Reporting by Douglas Busvine; editing by John Stonestreet)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|