Powerhouse U.S. cities home to worst wage inequality
Send a link to a friend
[October 08, 2019]
By Jonnelle Marte
(Reuters) - Wage inequality has soared in
many of the United States' biggest cities over the past 35 years as
companies cluster in urban centers, driving big paychecks for in-demand
workers, according to a report by the New York Federal Reserve.
At the same time, a broad swath of Americans in the very same cities is
being left behind, with wage increases for low- to middle-wage employees
failing to keep pace with the dramatic gains by high-end workers.
Cities such as New York, Houston and San Francisco have moved to near
the top of the rankings in recent years in terms of wage inequality, the
report by economists Jaison Abel and Richard Deitz released on Monday
found.
In San Francisco, inflation-adjusted wages for workers in the top 5% of
wage earners grew by 120% between 1980 and 2015, while wages for the
bottom 10% of earners grew by just 20%.
In New York City, wages grew by 110% for the top 5% of workers, but just
15% for the bottom 10%, according to the report.
Economic inequality has been rising across the United States as
globalization and automation eliminate some middle-income jobs and
highly skilled workers in technology, finance and other sectors win
higher wage premiums.
The changes are making city life more challenging for lower wage
workers, who are struggling to keep up with rising housing costs and
other bills.
"For people in these lower paid occupations, it's less appealing," said
Nick Bunker, an economist at Indeed Hire Lab. "There are fewer
opportunities."
UNEQUAL GROWTH
Cities with "sluggish economies" tended to have weaker wage gains for
all workers, but also lower levels of inequality than larger cities, the
researchers found.
This is especially true in cities where the main industries are
struggling financially, like Detroit, where automation and auto plant
closures have led to job losses.
While areas such as the thriving tech sector in the San Francisco-San
Jose region have moved up the rankings, some cities with the most or
least inequality in 1980 were still marked by extremes 35 years later.
[to top of second column]
|
People walk along Wall Street during the morning commute in the
financial district during a winter nor'easter in New York City,
U.S., March 2, 2018. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
Fairfield, Connecticut, about 50 miles northeast of New York City
and home to General Electric's headquarters from the 1970s until
2016, had the starkest wage gap between rich and poor in both 1980
and in 2015.
The disparity, however, has become more dramatic. In 1980, a
Fairfield resident with earnings in the top 10% made nearly six
times as much as a neighbor in the bottom 10%. By 2015, those on the
high end earned nine times as much.
Bakersfield and Santa Cruz in California also had persistently high
levels of inequality, the report found.
At the other end of the spectrum, cities such as Erie, Pennsylvania,
Utica-Rome, New York, and Sheboygan, Wisconsin, had some of the
lowest levels of inequality.
Lower wage workers have less leverage than they did in previous
generations because unions are weaker now, said Josh Bivens,
research director for the Economic Policy Institute. Long periods of
high unemployment have also limited workers' ability to push for
better pay, he said.
"In the last 30 years, lots of those things that provided wage
growth for low- and moderate-wage workers have been stripped away,"
Bivens said.
Recent trends in the labor market may provide some relief,he said.
Some states and cities have approved minimum wage increases in the
past couple of years, while a tight labor market has also helped to
create better opportunities for some low and middle wage workers.
But those improvements are likely not enough to close the gap,
Bivens said.
(Reporting by Jonnelle Marte; Editing by Heather Timmons and Richard
Pullin)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|