Democrats alarmed about possible U.S. withdrawal from Open Skies treaty
Send a link to a friend
[October 09, 2019]
By Arshad Mohammed and Jonathan Landay
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Four senior
Democratic lawmakers said on Tuesday they believed the Trump
administration may withdraw from a treaty that allows unarmed
surveillance flights over U.S., Russian and other territory, warning it
would be a gift to Russia and undermine confidence in the U.S.
commitment to Ukraine.
"Pulling out of the Open Skies Treaty, an important multilateral arms
control agreement, would be yet another gift from the Trump
administration to (Russian President Vladimir) Putin," the Democrats on
the House and Senate foreign relations and armed services committees
wrote in a letter to the U.S. secretaries of state and defense seen by
Reuters.
"The Open Skies Treaty is a critical element of U.S. and European
security, and a decision to withdraw would be another blow to regional
stability as well as Ukrainian security," wrote Senators Robert Menendez
and Jack Reed, respectively the top Democrats on the Senate foreign
relations and armed services panels, and congressmen Eliot Engel and
Adam Smith, chairs of the House foreign affairs and armed services
panels, respectively.
The treaty, which was signed in 1992 and entered into force in 2002,
permits each of the nations that are parties to it to carry out
short-notice, unarmed surveillance flights over the entire territory of
the other parties.
The purpose of the treaty, which allows nations to collect information
on one another's military forces, is to increase transparency and build
confidence among the states that are party to it, including the United
States, Russia and Ukraine.
Asked to comment on the letter, a State Department spokesman who spoke
on condition of anonymity said: "We do not comment on congressional
correspondence. We continue to implement the treaty and are in full
compliance with our obligations under this treaty, unlike Russia."
The Pentagon did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
In their letter, the four Democrats said the United States carried out
an extraordinary flight under the treaty in December 2018, after Russia
had opened fire on and seized three Ukrainian navy ships and their crews
in a Nov. 25 incident in the Black Sea, as well as in 2014, after Russia
annexed Crimea from Ukraine.
[to top of second column]
|
Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) questions David Marcus, head of
Facebook's Calibra (digital wallet service), during a testimony
before a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing
on "Examining Facebook's Proposed Digital Currency and Data Privacy
Considerations" on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 16, 2019.
REUTERS/Erin Scott
"Withdrawing from the Open Skies Treaty would be perceived as
casting further doubt on the status of the United States commitment
to Ukraine's security and would advance the Russian narrative that
the United States is an unreliable partner in the region," added the
letter to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Secretary of Defense
Mark Esper.
Some experts and administration officials believe the treaty has
outlived its usefulness, partly because of alleged violations by
Moscow. These include restrictions Moscow imposed on certain
observation flights over Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave on the
Baltic Sea sandwiched between Poland and Lithuania, and flights near
the disputed border between Russia and Georgia.
In response, the United States in 2016 restricted Russian
observation flights over the Pacific Fleet in Hawaii and missile
defense interceptor sites at Fort Greely, Alaska.
A former Trump administration official, speaking on condition of
anonymity, said the treaty was outdated because the United States
can share satellite imagery that is not overly sensitive with other
countries. The former official also said countries now have access
to high-quality commercial satellite photographs.
"We can share satellite overhead depending on how sensitive it is,"
the former official said. "A lot of this you can get from commercial
satellites too."
According to the Arms Control Association nonprofit group, 34 states
are party to the treaty while a 35th, Kyrgyzstan, has signed but not
ratified it.
(Reporting by Arshad Mohammed and Jonathan Landay; Editing by Tom
Brown and Richard Pullin)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|