Explainer: How Trump used the U.S. government to chase conspiracy
theories
Send a link to a friend
[October 11, 2019]
By Brad Heath, Jonathan Landay and Mark Hosenball
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald
Trump has enlisted parts of the U.S. government and key allies in the
pursuit of unproven or disproven conspiracy theories, some incubated in
the dark and anonymous corners of the internet.
Text messages between U.S. diplomats, a whistleblower complaint and a
series of public statements by Trump and other officials in recent days
offer the clearest view yet of the extent to which the president has
used the government to chase accusations that secret forces have been
plotting against him.
Much of that evidence has surfaced because of an impeachment inquiry led
by Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Some of the evidence that has emerged shows that:
- State Department envoys in Europe offered Ukraine’s president a White
House visit if he promised to investigate a discredited theory
suggesting Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election that put Trump
in office. A whistleblower complaint by an intelligence officer
suggested Trump also held back nearly $400 million in security aid to
Ukraine as additional leverage, which Trump has denied doing.
- The Justice Department is now investigating its own probe into
Russia's meddling in the 2016 election and allegations that Trump's
campaign colluded with Moscow. Attorney General William Barr and another
senior department official traveled to Europe in recent months to
investigate the theory that the FBI investigation, first launched during
the presidential campaign in 2016, was actually a plot to stop Trump
from becoming president.
The president's tendency to say untrue things, particularly on Twitter,
has caused headaches for his administration before. Until now, however,
the government had largely taken pains to distance itself from such
statements.
As recently as last year, the Justice Department argued in a series of
court cases that when it came to national security, the president did
not necessarily know what he was tweeting about.
Here are the three cases in which Trump has publicly advanced views of
uncorroborated conspiracies behind episodes damaging his presidency. The
White House declined to comment on the cases:
A CROWDSTRIKE CONSPIRACY
Investigations by U.S. intelligence, law enforcement, Congress and
outside researchers have all concluded that Russia's government was to
blame for hacking Democratic Party organizations and leaking stolen
emails at politically opportune moments in 2016. Russia has denied
involvement, although U.S. investigators even named the Russian officers
who were sitting at the keyboard during the breaches.
But another view has taken hold in on some right-wing websites. In that
telling, the cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which the DNC hired to
investigate the hack, falsely accused Russia, and spirited the hacked
email servers to Ukraine as part of a coverup. As early as March 2017,
an unnamed poster on the fringe website 4chan wrote that "Russia could
not have been the source of leaked Democrat emails released by WikiLeaks."
Other posts incorrectly said CrowdStrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch
is Ukrainian (he is a U.S. citizen born in Russia).
Trump referenced that view during a July 25 call with Ukrainian
President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, mentioning CrowdStrike by name, and
saying "The server they say Ukraine has it." Ahead of that call the U.S.
special representative to Ukraine, Kurt Volker, suggested in a text
message to a Zelenskiy aide that Zelenskiy might score a White House
visit if he promised to "get to the bottom of what happened" in 2016, a
reference to the election meddling.
CrowdStrike said in a blog post that its finding of Russian involvement
was supported by U.S. intelligence and that it never took possession of
the hacked servers.
Trump’s former homeland security adviser, Tom Bossert, said officials in
the administration tried to dissuade Trump. "It's not only a conspiracy
theory. It is completely debunked," he said on ABC's "This Week With
George Stephanopoulos" last month.
A MALTESE PROFESSOR
Russian involvement in the 2016 election produced an investigation like
few others in U.S. history, focused on whether Trump's campaign had
colluded with the Kremlin to win.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump, flanked by California State Senator Andreas
Borgeas (R-Modesto) and U.S. Representative Mark Meadows (R-NC),
speaks to reporters after signing executive orders on federal
regulation at the White House in Washington, U.S. October 9, 2019.
REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
Another theory, endorsed by Trump, holds that the probe was actually
an elaborate effort by U.S. officials and foreign spies to deny him
the presidency.
The FBI opened its Russia probe in 2016, after an Australian
diplomat reported that a Trump campaign aide named George
Papadopoulos had boasted that Russia had obtained email "dirt" on
Hillary Clinton, Trump's Democratic opponent, weeks before the hack
of the Democratic National Committee became public. Papadopoulos
told the FBI that he learned that from a Maltese academic, Joseph
Mifsud.
Papadopoulos has alleged that Mifsud was actually a Western
intelligence operative trying to frame him, and by extension, Trump.
On Twitter, Trump has hinted at that theory, repeating messages
asking why Mifsud was not charged with a crime, and quoting a
television interview in which Papadopoulos said the "whole thing was
a complete setup."
Now Barr is investigating how the government opened an investigation
- which went on to be led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller - that
the president dismissed as a "hoax" and a "witch hunt" from the
start. Barr told CBS News that official explanations for the FBI's
investigation "don't hang together." He has not elaborated on what
he is investigating or why, but told a Senate subcommittee this year
that "there is a basis for my concern."
Barr traveled to Italy seeking information about Mifsud, and to the
United Kingdom to meet with its intelligence officials. He has
tapped the lead federal prosecutor in Connecticut to lead the
review.
The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment.
WHISTLEBLOWER ALLEGATIONS
Trump's efforts to pursue those conspiracies came to light in large
part because an unnamed U.S. intelligence officer filed a
whistleblower complaint about Trump's July 25 call with Zelenskiy.
Trump has accused Democrats of secretly ghostwriting the
whistleblower's complaint. He described the whistleblower's sources
as "spying on our own president," and said they deserve "Big
Consequences."
He also said on Wednesday that the Intelligence Committee Inspector
General, who first reviewed the complaint and determined that it was
credible and urgent, had presided over a "scam."
Trump also said his administration was "trying to find out" the
whistleblower's identity, and that he wanted to question his unnamed
accuser.
When the whistleblower's lawyers said a second official had also
spoken to the Intelligence Community Inspector General, Trump said
that person too was "coming in from the Deep State," a phrase that
commonly refers to an alleged secret cabal within the U.S.
government.
One of the initial whistleblower's lawyers, Mark Zaid, has said that
Congress did not help the whistleblower prepare the nine-page set of
allegations that touched off the House impeachment inquiry.
Nonetheless, Trump's allies in the House and his lawyers have taken
up the accusation that the whistleblower worked in secret with the
Democratic head of the House committee leading the impeachment
inquiry, Adam Schiff.
In a letter Tuesday, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone cited this
among the president's reasons for refusing to cooperate with the
impeachment probe. The whistleblower's party leanings and his
contact with Democrats "raises serious questions that must be
investigated," he wrote.
(Reporting by Karen Freifeld, Brad Heath, Steve Holland, Mark
Hosenball, Jonathan Landay, David Morgan, Andy Sullivan and Heather
Timmons and Richard Cowan; Editing by Ross Colvin and Frances Kerry)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |