In a 3-0 decision, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court
of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said Sprint's contracts with
customers who bought "upgraded" phones did not unambiguously
prohibit those customers from reselling their phones to third
parties.
The court overturned a June 2018 judgment against Wireless
Buybacks LLC.
Sprint had accused the Odenton, Maryland-based company of
wrongfully enticing customers still under contract with the
mobile phone provider to sell their phones, and then reselling
the phones at higher prices.
Lisa Belot, a spokeswoman for Sprint, said the company was
disappointed and evaluating its next steps. Wireless Buybacks'
lawyer could not immediately be reached for comment.
The case concerned Sprint's contract with customers who buy
"upgraded" phones at steep discounts, whose cost the Overland
Park, Kansas-based company recoups through required service
contracts that can last two years.
Sprint claimed that resales cause harm because it loses money
when it sells phones at loss-leader prices, and because
customers may become dissatisfied if they sell upgraded phones
with the latest technology and instead use older Sprint phones.
Writing for the appeals court, Circuit Judge Jay Richardson
parsed the language of Sprint's contracts, and said U.S.
District Judge Catherine Blake in Baltimore erred in concluding
that Wireless Buybacks intentionally interfered with them.
"Sprint was not entitled to judgment as a matter of law,"
Richardson wrote. The appeals court returned the case to Blake
for further proceedings.
After winning the $26.9 million award, Sprint had said there was
a "legitimate secondary market" for cellphones, but customers
were harmed by Wireless Buybacks' activities.
The case is Sprint Nextel Corp et al v Wireless Buybacks
Holdings LLC et al, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No.
18-1729.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Lisa
Shumaker)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|