The analysis found that investment plans by
Royal Dutch Shell <RDSa.L>, BP <BP.L> and ExxonMobil <XOM.N>
among other companies will not be compatible with the 2015 Paris
Agreement, which aims to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees
Celsius.
"Every oil major is betting heavily against a 1.5 degree Celsius
world and investing in projects that are contrary to the Paris
goals," said report co-author Andrew Grant, a former natural
resources analyst at Barclays.
Big oil and gas companies have welcomed the U.N.-backed Paris
Agreement, in which governments agreed to curb greenhouse gas
emissions enough to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius,
or "well below" 2 degrees Celsius by the end of the century.
Scientists view 1.5 degrees Celsius as a tipping point where
climate impacts such as sea-level rise, natural disasters,
forced migration, failed harvests and deadly heatwaves will
rapidly start to intensify if it is breached.
Carbon Tracker's analysis, co-authored by Mike Coffin, a former
geologist at BP, found that 18 newly approved oil and gas
projects worth $50 billion could be left "deep out of the money"
in a lower carbon world.
The projects include Shell's $13 billion liquefied natural gas
(LNG) Canada LNG project, a $4.3 billion oilfield expansion
project in Azerbaijan owned by BP, Exxon, Chevron <CVX.N> and
Equinor <EQNR.OL>, and a $1.3 billion deepwater project in
Angola operated by BP, Exxon, Chevron, Total <TOTF.PA> and
Equinor.
The report also concluded that oil and gas companies risk
"wasting" $2.2 trillion by 2030 on new projects if governments
apply stricter curbs on greenhouse gas emissions.
Previous reports on the implications of climate change for oil
and gas companies by Carbon Tracker and other researchers have
contributed to a wave of investor pressure on majors to show
that their investments are aligned with the Paris goals.
While some companies including Shell, BP, Total and Equinor have
increased spending on renewable energy and introduced carbon
reduction targets, the sector says it needs to continue
investing in new projects to meet future demand for oil and gas
as Asian economies expand.
Shell said in a statement that it has set out an "ambition" to
halve net carbon emissions by 2050 "in step with society as it
moves toward meeting the aims of Paris."
"As the energy system evolves, so is our business, to provide
the mix of products that our customers need," Shell said.
BP said its strategy to produce low cost and low carbon oil and
gas was in line with the International Energy Agency (IEA)forecasts
and the Paris agreement.
"All of this is aimed at evolving BP from an oil and gas focused
company to a much broader energy company so that we are best
equipped to help the world get to net zero while meeting rising
energy demand," the company said in a statement.
Exxon, Chevron, Equinor and Total did not reply to requests for
comment.
Nevertheless, the latest Carbon Tracker report said the big oil
and gas companies spent at least 30% of their investment last
year on projects that are inconsistent with the path to limit
global warming to even 1.6 degrees Celsius.
"These projects represent an imminent challenge for investors
and companies looking to align with climate goals," the report
warned.
Carbon Tracker's calculations were based on three scenarios
produced by the Paris-based IEA models of oil and gas supply
under different warming pathways.
With fossil fuel supply on course to outstrip demand if the
world is to limit warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius, the report
assumed that the projects with the lowest production costs would
be the most competitive.
"Demand for oil can be satisfied with projects that break even
at below $40 per barrel and pursuing higher-cost projects risks
creating stranded assets that will never deliver adequate
returns," the report said.
Benchmark crude futures were trading at around $62 per barrel on
Thursday.
(Reporting by Ron Bousso; Editing by Susan Fenton)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|