| 
		Trump in high-stakes balancing act between oil and corn ahead of 2020 
		bid
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 06, 2019] 
		By Humeyra Pamuk and Jarrett Renshaw 
 WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - At a 
		closed-door meeting at the White House on Aug. 19, President Donald 
		Trump looked increasingly alarmed as his top envoy to China delivered 
		evidence of rising Farm Belt frustration over his biofuel policy along 
		with a stark warning: You've got a problem in Iowa.
 
 Terry Branstad, the former Iowa governor and now U.S. ambassador to 
		China, told Trump that while farmers may have remained loyal to him 
		despite the economic pain caused by the more than year-long trade war 
		with China, they would not stomach policies favoring the oil industry at 
		their expense, according to four people familiar with the substance of 
		the meeting.
 
 The administration, he explained, was undermining Trump’s support in the 
		battleground of Iowa and Wisconsin, by freeing too many oil refineries 
		from obligations to add corn-based ethanol to their fuel, according to 
		the sources, who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to 
		discuss internal deliberations.
 
 At the near two-hour meeting that also involved Trump's top security and 
		economy advisers, Branstad showed a map of counties that had flipped in 
		Trump’s favor in 2016 but were now considered at risk in the November 
		2020 election. Branstad also listed quotes from Democratic presidential 
		candidates assailing his biofuel policy as a betrayal of corn farmers, 
		and headlines about ethanol plants shutting down across the Midwest, the 
		sources said.
 
		
		 
		
 His presentation shocked the Republican president, who was previously 
		assured by his political advisers that he had Iowa "locked."
 
 "This was the first time that the president was made fully aware of how 
		angry these farmers are over this issue and that he could have a serious 
		problem in Iowa and potentially other states where this topic is an 
		issue," said one of the sources.
 
 Before the meeting ended, Trump had already dispatched his Cabinet 
		members to come up with solutions to stem the farm anger, the sources 
		said, setting off a chain reaction that the U.S. corn industry now hopes 
		will mean fresh concessions to help farmers reeling from plunging crop 
		prices and the loss of their biggest export market, China.
 
 CORN VS OIL
 
 The previously unreported details of the meeting underscore the 
		political bind Trump has found himself in as he looks to two of his most 
		prized constituencies – Big Oil and Big Corn - to again propel him into 
		the presidency next year.
 
 It also shows how the biofuel debate, once an overlooked policy 
		backwater, has become a volatile flashpoint as Trump tries to appease 
		these competing interests.
 
 The Renewable Fuel Standard requires oil refiners to blend biofuels like 
		corn-based ethanol into the fuel pool or pay a price, but allows the 
		government to issue waivers to small refineries who can prove compliance 
		causes a hardship. Smaller refiners say the blending mandate creates a 
		high financial burden that threatens their plants, jobs and regional 
		fuel supplies.
 
 Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency has handed out 85 such waivers 
		since he took office, up from 23 during the last three years of the 
		Obama administration, saving the oil industry hundreds of millions of 
		dollars but enraging the corn lobby which argues it kills demand.
 
 After a flurry of Cabinet meetings and phone calls that followed the 
		Aug. 19 meeting, Trump sent a tweet last week promising he was working 
		on a “giant package” that would make farmers “so happy.”
 
 An announcement is expected as early as next week, followed quickly by a 
		Trump trip to Iowa to celebrate, two of the sources told Reuters. Iowa's 
		Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, is helping to organize the rollout, 
		which could include boosting ethanol blending mandates and expanding the 
		markets for higher-ethanol blends of gasoline, the sources said. The 
		Trump administration is considering increasing the biofuel mandates by 1 
		billion gallons, or roughly 5%, for 2020, according to a document seen 
		by Reuters.
 
 The White House declined to comment on the matter, but said, "President 
		Trump is committed to ensuring our country not only continues to be the 
		agricultural envy of the world, but also remains energy independent and 
		secure.”
 
 Branstad did not respond to requests for comment.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			President Donald Trump (R) holds an umbrella over U.S. Ambassador to 
			China Terry Branstad, former governor of Iowa, as they arrive 
			together aboard Air Force One at Eastern Iowa Airport in Cedar 
			Rapids, Iowa, U.S. June 21, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo 
            
 
            'LET'S FIX THIS, RIGHT NOW'
 While corn and ethanol producers had largely blamed former EPA chief 
			Scott Pruitt, an ally of the oil industry and outspoken critic of 
			the biofuel mandate, for the initial expansion of the biofuel waiver 
			program, Trump in early August personally gave his blessing to the 
			agency to approve an additional 31 waivers to small refineries, 
			placing him at the center of the issue.
 
 At one point in last month's meeting, after Branstad drove home his 
			point about farmers' frustration, Trump called EPA Director Andrew 
			Wheeler, U.S. Energy Department head Rick Perry, and U.S. 
			Agricultural Department head Sonny Perdue to say: “Let’s fix this, 
			right now,” two sources said.
 
 The call to Wheeler forced him to leave a public meeting he had been 
			holding in Fairbanks, Alaska, over a local dispute, the sources told 
			Reuters.
 
 The EPA did not comment on the phone call, but noted that the 
			administration has overseen annual increases in domestic ethanol 
			production and record ethanol exports.
 
 While Branstad's meeting with Trump had initially been meant as an 
			opportunity for him to brief Trump on the ongoing trade negotiations 
			with China, most of the two hours related to biofuels instead, the 
			sources said.
 
 As Iowa’s former governor, Branstad was well-placed to pick up the 
			dissent from his agriculture contacts.
 
 The RFS has been an economic boon for corn and soybean farmers in 
			Iowa, the nation’s largest producer of ethanol. Iowa's ethanol 
			industry accounts for some 34,000 jobs. The state is also critical 
			because of its early placement in the national process of a 
			nominating a presidential candidate.
 
 "He crossed a line," said Nick Bowdish, chief executive of 
			Nebraska-based Siouxland Ethanol, referring to Trump's granting of 
			additional waivers.
 
 While rural Iowa Republicans are still unlikely to vote Democratic 
			in presidential elections, political strategists say there is a risk 
			they will sit out if Trump's economic policies continue to hurt 
			them. In 2016, Trump’s 9.54% victory margin over Hillary Clinton in 
			Iowa was the largest Republican victory in the state since President 
			Ronald Reagan in 1980.
 
            
			 
            
 Hoping to peel away rural support from Trump, most of the 20 
			Democratic presidential hopefuls have pounced on the waiver issue.
 
 "President Trump has lied to Iowa farmers at every turn," Democratic 
			front-runner Joe Biden tweeted on Aug. 16. "He promised to ‘unleash 
			ethanol’ but instead all he’s done is secretly unleash Big Oil from 
			its renewable fuel obligations."
 
 Heading into the 2020 election, Trump will undoubtedly work hard to 
			give Iowa farmers something to be happy about since they have been 
			asked to bear the brunt of his trade wars, said Republican 
			strategist Alex Vogel, who has served as a lawyer for the Republican 
			National Committee and former Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill 
			Frist.
 
 “It’s really hard, if not impossible, to come up with solutions that 
			make Iowa farmers and the energy industry happy on the RFS," Vogel 
			said. "The president has a fair amount of capital built up with the 
			energy industry, so I suspect he will lean toward the farmers on 
			this one."
 
 (Reporting by Humeyra Pamuk in Washington and Jarrett Renshaw in New 
			York; Additional reporting by Stephanie Kelly in Jackson, Nebraska, 
			and Chris Prentice in New York; Editing by Soyoung Kim and Matthew 
			Lewis)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |