Trump in high-stakes balancing act between oil and corn ahead of 2020
bid
Send a link to a friend
[September 06, 2019]
By Humeyra Pamuk and Jarrett Renshaw
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - At a
closed-door meeting at the White House on Aug. 19, President Donald
Trump looked increasingly alarmed as his top envoy to China delivered
evidence of rising Farm Belt frustration over his biofuel policy along
with a stark warning: You've got a problem in Iowa.
Terry Branstad, the former Iowa governor and now U.S. ambassador to
China, told Trump that while farmers may have remained loyal to him
despite the economic pain caused by the more than year-long trade war
with China, they would not stomach policies favoring the oil industry at
their expense, according to four people familiar with the substance of
the meeting.
The administration, he explained, was undermining Trump’s support in the
battleground of Iowa and Wisconsin, by freeing too many oil refineries
from obligations to add corn-based ethanol to their fuel, according to
the sources, who requested anonymity because they are not authorized to
discuss internal deliberations.
At the near two-hour meeting that also involved Trump's top security and
economy advisers, Branstad showed a map of counties that had flipped in
Trump’s favor in 2016 but were now considered at risk in the November
2020 election. Branstad also listed quotes from Democratic presidential
candidates assailing his biofuel policy as a betrayal of corn farmers,
and headlines about ethanol plants shutting down across the Midwest, the
sources said.
His presentation shocked the Republican president, who was previously
assured by his political advisers that he had Iowa "locked."
"This was the first time that the president was made fully aware of how
angry these farmers are over this issue and that he could have a serious
problem in Iowa and potentially other states where this topic is an
issue," said one of the sources.
Before the meeting ended, Trump had already dispatched his Cabinet
members to come up with solutions to stem the farm anger, the sources
said, setting off a chain reaction that the U.S. corn industry now hopes
will mean fresh concessions to help farmers reeling from plunging crop
prices and the loss of their biggest export market, China.
CORN VS OIL
The previously unreported details of the meeting underscore the
political bind Trump has found himself in as he looks to two of his most
prized constituencies – Big Oil and Big Corn - to again propel him into
the presidency next year.
It also shows how the biofuel debate, once an overlooked policy
backwater, has become a volatile flashpoint as Trump tries to appease
these competing interests.
The Renewable Fuel Standard requires oil refiners to blend biofuels like
corn-based ethanol into the fuel pool or pay a price, but allows the
government to issue waivers to small refineries who can prove compliance
causes a hardship. Smaller refiners say the blending mandate creates a
high financial burden that threatens their plants, jobs and regional
fuel supplies.
Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency has handed out 85 such waivers
since he took office, up from 23 during the last three years of the
Obama administration, saving the oil industry hundreds of millions of
dollars but enraging the corn lobby which argues it kills demand.
After a flurry of Cabinet meetings and phone calls that followed the
Aug. 19 meeting, Trump sent a tweet last week promising he was working
on a “giant package” that would make farmers “so happy.”
An announcement is expected as early as next week, followed quickly by a
Trump trip to Iowa to celebrate, two of the sources told Reuters. Iowa's
Republican governor, Kim Reynolds, is helping to organize the rollout,
which could include boosting ethanol blending mandates and expanding the
markets for higher-ethanol blends of gasoline, the sources said. The
Trump administration is considering increasing the biofuel mandates by 1
billion gallons, or roughly 5%, for 2020, according to a document seen
by Reuters.
The White House declined to comment on the matter, but said, "President
Trump is committed to ensuring our country not only continues to be the
agricultural envy of the world, but also remains energy independent and
secure.”
Branstad did not respond to requests for comment.
[to top of second column]
|
President Donald Trump (R) holds an umbrella over U.S. Ambassador to
China Terry Branstad, former governor of Iowa, as they arrive
together aboard Air Force One at Eastern Iowa Airport in Cedar
Rapids, Iowa, U.S. June 21, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo
'LET'S FIX THIS, RIGHT NOW'
While corn and ethanol producers had largely blamed former EPA chief
Scott Pruitt, an ally of the oil industry and outspoken critic of
the biofuel mandate, for the initial expansion of the biofuel waiver
program, Trump in early August personally gave his blessing to the
agency to approve an additional 31 waivers to small refineries,
placing him at the center of the issue.
At one point in last month's meeting, after Branstad drove home his
point about farmers' frustration, Trump called EPA Director Andrew
Wheeler, U.S. Energy Department head Rick Perry, and U.S.
Agricultural Department head Sonny Perdue to say: “Let’s fix this,
right now,” two sources said.
The call to Wheeler forced him to leave a public meeting he had been
holding in Fairbanks, Alaska, over a local dispute, the sources told
Reuters.
The EPA did not comment on the phone call, but noted that the
administration has overseen annual increases in domestic ethanol
production and record ethanol exports.
While Branstad's meeting with Trump had initially been meant as an
opportunity for him to brief Trump on the ongoing trade negotiations
with China, most of the two hours related to biofuels instead, the
sources said.
As Iowa’s former governor, Branstad was well-placed to pick up the
dissent from his agriculture contacts.
The RFS has been an economic boon for corn and soybean farmers in
Iowa, the nation’s largest producer of ethanol. Iowa's ethanol
industry accounts for some 34,000 jobs. The state is also critical
because of its early placement in the national process of a
nominating a presidential candidate.
"He crossed a line," said Nick Bowdish, chief executive of
Nebraska-based Siouxland Ethanol, referring to Trump's granting of
additional waivers.
While rural Iowa Republicans are still unlikely to vote Democratic
in presidential elections, political strategists say there is a risk
they will sit out if Trump's economic policies continue to hurt
them. In 2016, Trump’s 9.54% victory margin over Hillary Clinton in
Iowa was the largest Republican victory in the state since President
Ronald Reagan in 1980.
Hoping to peel away rural support from Trump, most of the 20
Democratic presidential hopefuls have pounced on the waiver issue.
"President Trump has lied to Iowa farmers at every turn," Democratic
front-runner Joe Biden tweeted on Aug. 16. "He promised to ‘unleash
ethanol’ but instead all he’s done is secretly unleash Big Oil from
its renewable fuel obligations."
Heading into the 2020 election, Trump will undoubtedly work hard to
give Iowa farmers something to be happy about since they have been
asked to bear the brunt of his trade wars, said Republican
strategist Alex Vogel, who has served as a lawyer for the Republican
National Committee and former Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill
Frist.
“It’s really hard, if not impossible, to come up with solutions that
make Iowa farmers and the energy industry happy on the RFS," Vogel
said. "The president has a fair amount of capital built up with the
energy industry, so I suspect he will lean toward the farmers on
this one."
(Reporting by Humeyra Pamuk in Washington and Jarrett Renshaw in New
York; Additional reporting by Stephanie Kelly in Jackson, Nebraska,
and Chris Prentice in New York; Editing by Soyoung Kim and Matthew
Lewis)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |