Supreme Court backs Trump on asylum crackdown
Send a link to a friend
[September 12, 2019]
By Lawrence Hurley and Daniel Trotta
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court granted
a request by President Donald Trump's administration to fully enforce a
new rule that would curtail asylum applications by immigrants at the
U.S.-Mexico border, a key element of his hardline immigration policies.
The court said the rule, which requires most immigrants who want asylum
to first seek safe haven in a third country through which they had
traveled on their way to the United States, could go into effect as
litigation challenging its legality continues.
Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented.
The rule, unveiled on July 15, requires most immigrants who want U.S.
asylum to first seek asylum in a third country they had traveled through
on their way to the United States.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 16
limited a federal judge's injunction blocking the rule to the nine
Western states over which it has jurisdiction including the border
states of California and Arizona. That had left open the possibility
that the rule could be applied in the two other border states, Texas and
New Mexico.
[to top of second column]
|
Immigrants from Central America and Mexican citizens, who are
fleeing from violence and poverty, queue to cross into the U.S. to
apply for asylum at the new border crossing of El Chaparral in
Tijuana, Mexico, November 24, 2016. REUTERS/Jorge Duenes
The American Civil Liberties Union and others who challenged the
administration's policy in federal court said it violates U.S.
immigration law and accused the administration of failing to follow
the correct legal process in issuing the rule.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley and Daniel Trotta; Additional
reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Howard Goller)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |