| The iPhone maker is expected to send a six-man 
				delegation headed by Chief Financial Officer Luca Maestri to the 
				two-day court hearing at the Luxembourg-based General Court, the 
				EU's second highest court.
 In August 2016, the Commission said tax rulings by Ireland in 
				1991 and in 2007 had artificially reduced Apple's tax burden for 
				over two decades, effectively making it illegal state aid.
 
 European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager pointed to 
				a 0.005% tax rate paid by Apple's main Irish unit in 2014 as an 
				example of the unusually low payments by the company.
 
 Apple is expected to argue that it did nothing wrong as it had 
				followed Irish and U.S. tax laws. It made similar arguments in a 
				blog following an EU tax ruling a couple of years ago.
 
 It will tell the court that the bulk of its taxes are owed to 
				the United States because the majority of the value in its 
				products including design, engineering and development, is 
				created there.
 
 Ireland, which has accused the Commission of exceeding its 
				powers and interfering with the EU member's national sovereignty 
				over tax affairs, is also challenging the EU ruling.
 
 The Irish tax regime is a key attraction for multinational 
				companies, which employ around 10% of the country's workforce.
 
 Luxembourg is backing Ireland while Poland is supporting the 
				Commission. Vestager has also gone after sweetheart deals 
				offered by the Netherlands to Starbucks <SBUX.O>, Luxembourg to 
				Amazon <AMZN.O>, Fiat <FCHA.MI> and Engie <ENGIE.PA> as well as 
				a British tax scheme for multinationals.
 
 The EU executive's tax crackdown suffered a setback in February 
				this year when the General Court dismissed its ruling against a 
				Belgian tax break that benefited BP <BP.L>, BASF <BASFn.DE> and 
				more than 30 other multinationals, saying that it was not an aid 
				scheme.
 
 However, the Commission relaunched this case on Monday. 
				[B5N25N00B]
 
 The joint Apple cases are T-778/16 Ireland v Commission and 
				T-892/16 Apple Sales International and Apple Operations Europe v 
				Commission.
 
 (Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; editing by Philip Blenkinsop and 
				Emelia Sithole-Matarise)
 
			[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
				Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
				 
				  |  |