| 
		Explainer: U.S. enacts sweeping new asylum bar following Supreme Court 
		decision
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 17, 2019] 
		By Tom Hals and Kristina Cooke 
 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court last 
		week allowed a Trump administration rule to temporarily take effect that 
		will radically reduce the number of migrants eligible to seek U.S. 
		asylum. Judges and asylum officers are now being directed to implement 
		it.
 
 Immigration is central to U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda and the 
		government has said the new rule will reduce fraudulent asylum claims, 
		while immigrant advocates say it risks returning vulnerable migrants to 
		danger and even death.
 
 The legal challenges against the rule are ongoing - in courts in 
		California and Washington D.C. - but the long process to decide whether 
		it is unlawful will likely continue past the 2020 elections, legal 
		experts say.
 
 In the interim, tens of thousands of asylum claims are likely to be 
		denied. The following explains how that could happen.
 
 WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A MIGRANT SEEKS ASYLUM AT THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER?
 
 Some migrants head to a legal port of entry to ask border agents for 
		asylum, but since only a few are let across each day, long wait lists 
		have formed. Other migrants cross the border illegally and turn 
		themselves in to the first agents they see to ask for refuge.
 
		
		 
		Under the typical process, asylum seekers are given an interview with a 
		U.S. asylum officer to determine if they have a "credible fear" of 
		persecution in their home country. If they pass that initial screening, 
		they face an immigration judge who decides if their asylum claim has 
		merit - a process that can take months or years because of huge court 
		backlogs. Some migrants are detained during the wait, but many are 
		released on bond or parole into the United States.
 This year, however, the Trump administration adopted a new policy called 
		the "Migrant Protection Protocols," which skips the initial "credible 
		fear" screening and sends some migrants to wait in Mexico during the 
		U.S. court process. So far about 42,000 migrants have been returned to 
		Mexico under the rapidly expanding policy that began on Jan. 29. That is 
		only about 6% of the roughly 680,000 migrants who crossed the U.S. 
		southern border from February through August this year.
 
 For a story on the rollout of the Remain In Mexico policy click here: 
		https://reut.rs/2ksFFYE
 
 WHO IS AFFECTED BY THE NEW RULE?
 
 The rule cuts off the possibility of U.S. asylum for almost all migrants 
		arriving at the southern border if they have not sought refuge in a 
		country they traveled through first. It will be applied by both asylum 
		officers and immigration judges.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			People bathe and wash clothes in the Rio Grande, across the river 
			from a Brownsville, Texas U.S. Customs and Border Protection tent 
			facility where immigration hearings were being held by video 
			teleconference, in Matamoros, Mexico September 12, 2019. 
			REUTERS/Veronica G. Cardenas/File Photo 
            
 
            It will generally affect all asylum applications of migrants who 
			entered the country on or after July 16, the day the rule was 
			published in the Federal Register, according to guidance sent to 
			immigration judges by the Executive Office for Immigration Review, 
			the Department of Justice agency that runs the immigration courts.
 Most migrants arriving at the border are from the Central American 
			countries of El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, but the rule will 
			also hit significant numbers of Cubans, Venezuelans, Indians and 
			Africans who make their way through many countries before arriving 
			at the U.S.-Mexico border.
 
 CAN MIGRANTS AT THE SOUTHERN BORDER STILL SEEK PROTECTION IN THE 
			UNITED STATES?
 
 The new rule specifically allows migrants to seek two other kinds of 
			protection in the United States. One is under the Convention Against 
			Torture and the other is known as withholding of removal. However, 
			the applicant has to clear a higher bar to be eligible for that type 
			of relief, and there are fewer benefits.
 
 Migrants can also seek refuge in Mexico or countries farther south 
			like Guatemala but the asylum agencies there are small and already 
			overwhelmed with claims.
 
 For a story on Mexico's asylum agency click here: https://reut.rs/2lTYnZl
 
 DOES THE RULE GO INTO EFFECT IMMEDIATELY?
 
 Kenneth Cuccinelli, the head of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration 
			Services (USCIS), the agency that employs asylum officers, told CBS 
			News on Sunday that the immigration agencies and the Department of 
			Justice were "ramping this up as quickly as we can logistically ... 
			This will be measured in days not weeks." The Department of Justice 
			oversees the immigration courts.
 
 The rule had already been implemented in Texas and Arizona starting 
			mid-August after an appellate court narrowed an earlier nationwide 
			block. Immigration attorneys representing migrants in detention at a 
			facility in Dilley, Texas, saw a jump in the number of initial 
			screening denials of asylum applicants during that time.
 
 (Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware, and Kristina Cooke 
			in San Francisco; Editing by Mica Rosenberg and Matthew Lewis)
 
		[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |