Cut and run: How U.S. stocks react in Fed easing cycles
Send a link to a friend
[September 18, 2019] By
Lewis Krauskopf
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Not all U.S.
rate-cutting cycles are created equal, at least when it comes to how the
stock market reacts.
The Federal Reserve is expected to lower interest rates when it issues
its policy statement on Wednesday at the close of a two-day meeting. It
would be the central bank's second reduction this year, on the heels of
a 25 basis point cut at the July policy meeting, the first rate cut
since 2008.
As recently as last week, markets were pricing in a greater than 90%
probability that the Fed will shave another quarter point from its
overnight lending rate, which is currently set in a range of 2.00% to
2.25%.
Based on past performance of the stock market following a rate cut, at
issue for the market's performance could be how dire the economy is now
and how successful the Fed will appear to have been in staving off a
downturn.
Of the past eight easing cycles since 1981, four have been identified as
"insurance" cycles, when problems loomed but the economy was not in a
recession, while four occurred when the economy was entering, or already
in, recession, according to research from Allianz Global Investors.
After a year, the benchmark S&P 500 <.SPX> rose an average of 20.4%
during insurance cycles, while the index fell an average of 10.2% during
pre-recession cycles, according to Allianz.
(Graphic: Easing cycles not created equal -
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/
gfx/editorcharts/USA-ECONOMY-FED/0H001QX678CV/eikon.png)
Another distinction in easing cycles: Smaller-cap stocks tend to
outperform large caps, according to Jefferies research. Small-cap stocks
have climbed 28% overall in the 12 months following the first rate cut,
compared to 15% for large caps, the firm said.
Smaller companies are perceived to be more leveraged to the state of the
U.S. economy and have higher debt loads or weaker balance sheets,
according to Jefferies equity strategist Steven DeSanctis, and lower
rates are expected to improve both situations.
(Graphic: Small-cap stocks beat large after rate cuts -
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/
editorcharts/USA-ECONOMY-FED/0H001QX698D1/eikon.png)
[to top of second column] |
The Federal Reserve building is pictured in Washington, DC, U.S.,
August 22, 2018. REUTERS/Chris Wattie/File Photo
Following a second rate cut in a cycle, which Wednesday's would be, the Dow
Jones Industrial Average <.DJI> has gained an average of 20.3% one year later,
according to Ned Davis Research.
"Perhaps because the second cut demonstrates the Fed’s commitment, or perhaps
because the liquidity from the first cut had begun to work through the system,
the gains have been immediate, with an average jump of 9.7% three months after
the second cut," Ed Clissold, chief U.S. strategist at Ned Davis Research, said
in a recent report.
(Graphic: How stocks perform following second Fed cut -
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/
gfx/editorcharts/USA-ECONOMY-FED/0H001QX6C8D7/eikon.png)
That the Fed seems to be poised for a 25 basis point cut, as opposed to a larger
cut of 50 basis points, could spell better news for stocks.
Over the past 40 years, when the first two cuts in an easing cycle have been
only 25 basis points, the S&P 500 has always been higher six and 12 months
later, according to Ryan Detrick, senior market analyst at LPL Financial.
Returns are more mixed when one of the cuts has been 50 basis points.
“History would suggest bulls should be rooting for a 25 basis point cut this
week, as these are more viewed as 'insurance cuts' versus a 50 basis point cut,
which could mean the Fed sees real trouble down the road,” Detrick said.
(Graphic: Fed rate cuts and stocks: When bigger means worse -
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/
gfx/editorcharts/USA-ECONOMY-FED/0H001QX798FW/eikon.png)
(Reporting by Lewis Krauskopf; Editing by Alden Bentley and Leslie Adler)
[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |