| 
						
						
						 Baby 
						gut study finds bacteria different after C-section 
						births
   Send a link to a friend 
		[September 19, 2019]  
		By Kate Kelland, Health and Science Correspondent
 LONDON, Sept 18 (Reuters) - A huge study of 
		babies' stool samples has found key differences between infants born 
		vaginally and via Caesarean section, offering clues about the 
		development of the human immune system, researchers said on Wednesday.
 | 
        
            | 
			
			 Vaginally born babies got most of their gut bacteria from their 
			mother, but C-section babies did not and had more bacteria linked to 
			the hospital around them, the study found. 
 It is not clear what impact the difference may have on children's 
			future health, and the findings should not deter women from having 
			C-section births, the scientists leading the work said.
 
 But the so-called "baby biome" project - the world's largest such 
			study - had opened a window on a little-understood stage in the 
			development of human immunity, they added.
 
 "The first weeks of life are a critical window of development of the 
			baby's immune system, but we know very little about it," said Peter 
			Brocklehurst, a Birmingham University professor who co-led the 
			study.
 
			
			 
			"We need to follow up ... these babies as they grow to see if early 
			differences in the microbiome lead to any health issues."
 The gut microbiome is a complex ecosystem of millions of microbes 
			and is thought by scientists to be important for how the immune 
			system develops.
 
 Previous research has suggested that a lack of exposure to some 
			microbes in early life is implicated in autoimmune diseases such as 
			asthma, allergies and diabetes.
 
 But scientists have not yet been able to work out how important the 
			initial gut microbiome - or "baby biome" - is to future immunity and 
			health, or how a baby's microbiome develops, or what happens to it 
			with different modes of birth.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
             
			In this research, published in the journal Nature, scientists from 
			University College London, Wellcome Sanger Institute and Birmingham 
			University used DNA sequencing to analyse more than 1,600 gut 
			bacteria samples from 175 mothers and almost 600 babies. 
			In samples from mothers and from the babies at four, seven and 21 
			days old, the team found there was a significant difference between 
			the two delivery methods - with vaginally delivered babies having 
			many more health-associated bacteria from their mothers than babies 
			born by Caesarean.
 In place of some of the mother's bacteria, the C-section babies had 
			more bacteria typically found in hospitals, the researchers said, 
			and these bugs were also more likely to be drug-resistant.
 
 "At the moment we don't understand the long-term consequences of 
			this," Brocklehurst said at a briefing about the results. "It's 
			clearly complex and we're only just beginning to scratch the 
			surface."
 
 (Reporting by Kate Kelland; Editing by Andrew Heavens)
 
			[© 2019 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2019 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. 
			
			
			 |