|
 The Chicago Teachers Union announced on Sept. 26 its members
voted to authorize a strike, which could occur as early as Oct. 7. That would
push more than 361,000 Chicago Public Schools students, most of whom are low
income, out of their classrooms for an indefinite period.
With 94% of those who voted authorizing the strike, CTU President Jesse Sharky
declared it “a true mandate for change.”
But there’s more to this strike than rhetoric or sound bites. Here are six
things about CPS and the likely CTU strike you should know.
1. CPS teachers are already well compensated.
CTU is demanding salary increases of 15% over the next three years, along with
reduced health insurance premiums.
According to the Illinois State Board of Education, less than 1% of Illinois
districts have a higher base salary than CPS. Its maximum salary for a teacher
with a bachelor’s degree is also the fourth highest at over $96,000, not
adjusted for cost of living.
CPS has the highest maximum salary for teachers with a bachelor’s degree, as
well as the highest maximum salary for teachers with a master’s degree, when
compared to school districts in the nation’s 10 largest cities for which data
was available and adjusted for cost of living, according to the Teacher Contract
Database of the National Council on Teacher Quality. They come in second, behind
San Antonio Independent School District, for base salary of new teachers with
bachelor’s degrees and master’s degrees.
CPS has the highest average salary among school districts in 10 of the nation’s
top 13 largest cities – comparable data was not available for three of the
cities – when adjusted for cost of living.
2. CTU rejected a generous offer of 16% pay raises and a
mere 1% increase in health insurance premiums over 5 years.
In July, a neutral fact finder – chosen by both CTU and Chicago
Public Schools – evaluated the school district’s proposals as well as the
union’s, taking into consideration the district’s financial ability to fund the
proposals as well as the present and future general economic conditions of the
city and state, per Illinois law.
Lightfoot said her administration would match the fact finder’s recommendations
– including 16% pay raises and a 1% increase in health insurance premiums over a
five-year period.
CTU rejected the deal.
3. The real victims of a strike are the students.
If CTU goes on strike, more than 360,000 students – more than
76 percent of whom are low income – will not be in school for an indefinite
period.
Walking out on them leaves them with no place to go, and leaves parents in the
lurch.
But it isn’t just inconvenient for parents and students – it can academically
hurt youngsters.
For example, one study found that long strikes of 10 or more days have a
significant negative effect on math test scores. Another found that extended
work disruptions have negative effects on math and English achievement.
Chicago Public Schools continues to underperform the state academic achievement
benchmarks year after year. Average SAT scores in CPS schools are 56 points
lower than the state average, four-year graduation rates are 11 percentage
points lower and the percentage of CPS teachers rated proficient or excellent
comes in at 11 percentage points lower than the state average. And currently, 1
in 4 CPS students don’t graduate high school.
 What’s more, almost a quarter of CPS students are chronically absent – with
almost a third of students chronically truant. Going on strike certainly won’t
help.
to top of second column] |
4.CPS is not in a position to meet CTU’s
demands.
CTU contends CPS is capable of paying for the cost
of its demands because of some increases in funding, such as state
revenue sharing. CPS, however, has already included state revenue
sharing in its budget projections, leaving no room for higher costs.
It further explains that despite some increases in funding, it
remains in an overall negative cash position and must borrow on a
short-term basis to meet day-to-day obligations. It does not have a
surplus of revenue to pay for CTU’s salary demands.
Indeed, CPS’ history of mismanagement and poor financial decisions
has led to excessive borrowing and a “junk” credit rating. Its debt
has quadrupled since 1998, with current debt at over $8 billion.
The district is also forced to allocate hundreds of millions of
dollars each year to the Chicago Teachers Pension Fund after
multiple years of making inadequate contributions.
Union demands would cost more than $1.1 billion over three years for
salary increases and extra staff and community schools, compared to
$216 million for Mayor Lori Lightfoot’s proposal. CPS is simply not
in a position to meet these demands
5. Chicago taxpayers are not in a position to meet CTU’s demands.
Since 2010, property taxes on the typical Chicago
home have grown 188% faster than the rate of home price
appreciation. In fact, the typical homeowner did not see the economy
grow fast enough to keep up with the pace of the growth in property
taxes. Property tax bills grew 55% faster than personal incomes from
2007-2017.
If CTU got its demands and the entire cost were paid through
property taxes, a Chicago family in a median-value home would pay
$221 more in the first year of the contract than they would have
under the school district’s original proposal. During former Chicago
Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s term, Chicagoans suffered $864 million in
annual tax increases through property taxes, water and sewer fees,
and the 911 surcharge.
As taxation drastically increases, homeowners stage their own walk
out: Chicago’s population dropped in each of the past four years.
CTU’s expensive demands will pressure even more people to leave.
6. CTU has a long history of using strikes as a weapon – to the
detriment of Chicagoans.
Between 1969 and 1987, CTU went on strike at least
seven times.
More recently, CTU went on strike in 2012 demanding higher wages. In
the short term, students missed seven days of instruction time and
students’ families were left in a lurch.
The strike also had longer-term effects. After the strike ended, CPS
had to close 50 schools and lay off thousands of teachers.
On April 1, 2016, CTU once again turned its back on students and
parents by calling a one-day strike. What’s more, the union even
punished teachers who chose to support their students that day.
The Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board subsequently found
the strike was likely illegal. But the damage had already been done.
Then in September 2016, members of CTU voted to authorize yet
another strike. The union prepared to strike, but a contract with
CPS was negotiated before CTU once again decided to walk out on
students.
CTU also considered walking out once again on May 1, 2017, but that
strike was tabled.
Clearly, CTU uses its right to strike as a weapon to advance its own
agenda at all costs. Students, taxpayers and the city’s well-being
rarely enter the equation.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|
