In a first, Missouri sues China over coronavirus
economic losses
Send a link to a friend
[April 22, 2020] By
Jan Wolfe
(Reuters) - Missouri became on Tuesday the
first U.S. state to sue the Chinese government over its handling of the
coronavirus, saying that China's response to the outbreak that
originated in the city of Wuhan brought devastating economic losses to
the state.
In Beijing, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry dismissed the
accusation on Wednesday as "nothing short of absurdity" and lacking any
factual or legal basis.
The civil lawsuit, filed in federal court by Missouri Attorney General
Eric Schmitt, alleges negligence, among other claims. It says Missouri
and its residents suffered possibly tens of billions of dollars in
economic damages, and seeks cash compensation.
"The Chinese government lied to the world about the danger and
contagious nature of COVID-19, silenced whistleblowers, and did little
to stop the spread of the disease," Schmitt, a Republican, said in a
statement.
"They must be held accountable for their actions.”
The lawsuit also accuses the Chinese government of making the pandemic
worse by "hoarding" masks and other personal protective equipment (PPE).
U.S. President Donald Trump, also a Republican, initially lavished
praise on China and his counterpart Xi Jinping for the official response
to the outbreak, which has since spread worldwide to infect more than
2.5 million people.
But he and other senior U.S. officials have also referred to it as the
"Chinese virus" and in recent days have ramped up their rhetoric.
China is already facing similar lawsuits filed in U.S. courts on behalf
of U.S. business owners.
International law experts told Reuters that efforts in U.S. courts to
hold China liable for the virus would probably fail.
A legal doctrine called sovereign immunity offers foreign governments
broad protection from being sued in U.S. courts, said Tom Ginsburg, a
professor of international law at the University of Chicago.
Ginsburg said he thought the recent flurry of lawsuits against China
serves a political end for Republican leaders facing an election in
November.
[to top of second column] |
A shopper lines up to enter a Home Depot building supplies store
while practicing social distancing to help slow the spread of
coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in north St. Louis, Missouri, U.S.
April 4, 2020. REUTERS/Lawrence Bryant
"We are seeing a lot of people on the political right focus on the China issue
to cover up for the U.S. government's own errors," Ginsburg said.
Trump initially downplayed the seriousness of the virus, which has killed more
than 43,000 people in the United States, out of nearly 800,000 infections, by
Tuesday.
It has also forced state governors to declare stay-at-home orders that have
shuttered businesses and social activities, leading a record 22 million people
to seek unemployment benefits in the past month.
"If the United States wants to bring claims against China, it will have to do so
in an international forum," said Chimène Keitner, an international law professor
at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco.
"There is no civil jurisdiction over such claims in U.S. courts."
In Beijing, foreign ministry spokesman Geng Shuang also said China's response
was not under the jurisdiction of U.S. courts, adding that it had provided
updates on the outbreak to the United States since Jan. 3.
"Such abuse of litigation is not conducive to the epidemic response at home in
the United States and also runs counter to international cooperation," Geng told
a daily briefing on Wednesday, speaking about Missouri's move.
"What the United States should do is refute and reject such abuse of
litigation."
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; Additional reporting by Tom Daly in Beijing; Editing by
Sonya Hepinstall and Clarence Fernandez)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |