U.S. Supreme Court refuses to block Trump immigration policy during
pandemic
Send a link to a friend
[April 25, 2020]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court on Friday rejected a long-shot bid by New York and two other
states to suspend during the coronavirus pandemic a Trump administration
immigration policy that denies legal permanent residency to certain
immigrants deemed likely to require government assistance in the future.
The court turned away New York's request, which was joined by the states
of Connecticut and Vermont as well as New York City, with none of the
nine justices publicly dissenting.
The states argued that the regulation is hindering efforts to combat the
spread of the coronavirus "by deterring immigrants from accessing
healthcare and public benefits that are essential tools for protecting
the public."
The immigration rule has been criticized by immigrant rights advocates
as a "wealth test" that would disproportionately keep out non-white
immigrants. It is part of President Donald Trump's hardline immigration
policies.
The court in a brief order said nothing prevents the states from asking
a federal district court judge to block the regulation based on the
changing circumstances.
[to top of second column]
|
The Supreme Court stands in Washington, U.S., May 14, 2018.
REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
The justices also rejected a similar request made by Cook County,
Illinois, in a separate case concerning only that state.
In January, before the spread of the coronavirus around the world,
the court on a 5-4 vote allowed the policy to go into effect while
litigation over its legality continues in lower courts.
The court's five conservative justices were in the majority and its
four liberal justices dissented.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Kristina
Cooke; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|