U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan said the claim was
without merit, with the arbitrator, Les Weinstein, simply joking
when he said he dismissed the lawsuit in February and said he
acted out of fear.
"After carefully reviewing the full record, the court finds that
the arbitrator's concluding remarks, rather than a sincere
confession of fear, were simply an attempt at humor - one of
many made by the arbitrator throughout the hearing," Rakoff
wrote on Monday.
Spencer Meyer initiated the high-profile 2015 antitrust lawsuit
alleging Uber engaged in an illegal conspiracy with its drivers
to coordinate high "surge pricing" fares during periods of heavy
demand by agreeing to charge prices set by an algorithm in the
Uber ride-hailing app.
The lawsuit sought a nationwide ban against surge pricing. A
ruling against the company would have threatened Uber's
business, which takes a cut from drivers' earnings.
The company argues its drivers are independent contractors and
that its app is merely a technology platform connecting drivers
with passengers.
After going through several courts, the lawsuit was sent into
arbitration in 2019 in accordance with Uber's terms of service.
Weinstein, the arbitrator, dismissed Spencer's lawsuit on Feb.
22.
According to court transcripts, he concluded his ruling by
saying: "I must say I act out of fear. My fear is if I ruled
Uber illegal, I would need security. I wouldn't be able to walk
the streets at night. People would be after me."
Spencer in May asked Rakoff to overturn the ruling, arguing
Weinstein had displayed "evident partiality."
(Reporting by Tina Bellon in New York; Editing by Tom Brown)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|