In filings made as part of Purdue's bankruptcy proceedings that were
disclosed on Monday, the states said Purdue, backed by the wealthy
Sackler family, contributed to a public health crisis that has
claimed the lives of roughly 450,000 people since 1999 and caused
strains on healthcare and criminal justice systems. The filings
cited more than 200,000 deaths in the U.S. tied directly to
prescription opioids between 1999 and 2016.
In large states such as California and New York, claims alone
totaled more than $192 billion and $165 billion, respectively.
Forty-nine U.S. states, Washington, D.C. and various territories are
making the claims. Oklahoma settled litigation with Purdue last
year.
Purdue filed for bankruptcy in 2019 under pressure from more than
2,600 lawsuits brought by cities, counties, states, Native American
tribes, hospitals and others. The lawsuits said the company, and in
some cases the Sacklers, used deceptive marketing and took other
improper steps to flood communities with prescription opioids.
The company and family have denied the allegations and pledged to
help combat the opioid epidemic, including by providing addiction
treatment drugs and overdose reversal medications under development.
In response to the state claims, Purdue said it continues to work
toward resolving litigation and emerging from bankruptcy, and that
it is typical for claims from various creditors to be "filed in
amounts substantially larger than what is ultimately allowed by the
court."
Sackler representatives did not immediately respond to requests for
comment.
Purdue and the Sacklers have pointed to fentanyl and heroin as more
significant culprits in the opioid crisis. States in their filings,
though, pointed to National Institute on Drug Abuse research
estimating that about 80% of heroin abusers previously took
prescription opioids.
In addition to the assertions from states, Purdue faces claims
exceeding $18 billion from the U.S. Justice Department on account of
potential penalties resulting from criminal and civil
investigations.
[to top of second column] |
In filings tied to Purdue's bankruptcy case, federal prosecutors said Purdue
contributed to false claims being made to federal healthcare insurance programs
by allowing doctors to write medically unnecessary opioid prescriptions that
were at times tainted by illegal kickbacks, according to a person familiar with
the matter.
The Justice Department claims also included possible penalties arising from
allegations that Purdue violated the U.S. Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and
violations of federal conspiracy and anti-kickback laws, the person said.
The Justice Department has declined to comment on the claims.
Claims from states and federal prosecutors are being processed after being filed
just before a July 30 deadline set by a U.S. bankruptcy judge. While they will
collectively exceed trillions of dollars, the filings are in many cases
placeholders as opposed to roadmaps for how much money Purdue will ultimately
pay its creditors, the bulk of which are U.S., state and local governments.
Purdue is only worth a bit more than $2 billion if liquidated. The company
values a proposal to settle litigation, which includes providing addiction
treatment and overdose-reversing drugs, at more than $10 billion. The Sacklers
would contribute $3 billion and cede control of Purdue, with the company
becoming a trust run on behalf of plaintiffs.
Those financial realities underscore that Purdue does not have enough money to
satisfy the myriad claims against it.
States and other litigants are in talks to determine how to allocate proceeds
from Purdue’s bankruptcy estate as part of the company’s attempted
reorganization. Many states, including Massachusetts, New York and Connecticut,
have opposed Purdue’s settlement offer, insisting the Sacklers contribute more
money and reveal more details about their finances.
(Reporting by Mike Spector; editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |