As president, Biden would not trash all Trump's foreign policy legacy
Send a link to a friend
[August 24, 2020]
By David Brunnstrom, Humeyra Pamuk and Luke Baker
WASHINGTON/LONDON (Reuters) - When Donald
Trump was elected U.S. president in 2016, almost immediately, and with
evident relish, he set about trying to demolish Barack Obama's carefully
crafted foreign policy legacy.
In the following days, months and years, Trump threw out a trade deal
with the Asia-Pacific, a global climate accord, a nuclear agreement with
Iran and a process to end decades of hostility with Cuba.
The Republican leader also publicly attacked long-time U.S. allies from
Berlin to Tokyo while praising authoritarian rulers from Russia's
Vladimir Putin to North Korea's Kim Jong Un.
And after heaping praise on China's Xi Jinping, he launched trade and
rhetorical battles with Beijing that have sparked fears of a new Cold
War - or even military conflict.
Top former diplomats from around the world say Trump has severely
damaged faith in U.S. leadership and a Joe Biden victory in the Nov. 3
presidential election would bring even bigger sighs of relief in many
capitals than those when George W. Bush's presidency ended more than a
decade a ago.
They expect quick action by a Democratic administration to restore
signature Obama-era policies, starting with the climate accord.
But despite the widespread ill-feeling Trump has provoked, not all his
policy legacy will be hurled out of the window, and neither long-term
allies nor strategic rivals expect a soft touch from Biden, vice
president under Obama and a former senator with decades of foreign
policy experience.
They also do not expect much change from the inward-looking tendency
embodied by Trump's "America first" approach.
"We are really in a period of transition of defining a new American
policy in power politics, with China, with Russia ... so it's a new
world," said Gerard Araud, France's former ambassador to Washington.
"American presidents will be more committed to the national interest of
the U.S. The U.S. doesn't want to be the policeman of the world any
more; I think Obama and Trump understood that."
TRUMP'S CHALLENGE TO CHINA
While the Trump administration has provoked some alarm with the tone of
its recent attacks on China on issues ranging from the coronavirus to
espionage, there is broad agreement little will change in substance
under a Biden government when it comes to policy towards Beijing.
Indeed, while Trump has sought to portray both Obama and Biden as "soft"
on China, the previous administration pursued a tougher line against
Beijing than Trump did initially.
"In the last two years of Obama, they had a new China strategy," said
Michael Pillsbury, a former U.S. defense official and China analyst who
has worked as an outside adviser to Trump. "Many people think this was a
Trump invention; it's not."
He noted that Biden advisers Ely Ratner, Kurt Campbell, Brian McKeon,
Tony Blinken, Bob Work and Ash Carter had produced tough analyses on
China and shared deep concerns about its military buildup, espionage
activities and trade practices.
Peter Ricketts, a national security adviser to former British Prime
Minister David Cameron, had some praise for Trump's China approach, but
also a warning.
"The Trump administration crystallized a growing concern about China's
activities, including its much more assertive foreign policy and its
crackdown at home.
[to top of second column]
|
Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden accepts the 2020 Democratic
presidential nomination during a speech delivered for the largely
virtual 2020 Democratic National Convention from the Chase Center in
Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., August 20, 2020. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
"Trump's willingness to come forward and challenge that, to call
China out, that's been positive. The risk is that it could now go
too far and pitch into an all-out Cold War with China."
Tom Fletcher, a foreign-policy adviser to three past British prime
ministers, said he did not expect big changes on China under a Biden
administration, but a less abrasive style.
"I don't think the Biden policy will be a million miles away from
the Trump China policy. But the language will be different, and
there will be more wisdom and strategy behind it," he said.
Some analysts say Trump's unprecedented but still unsuccessful
engagement with North Korea could offer a future building block.
Biden has called Trump's personal diplomacy a "vanity project" that
should only happen with a strategy to move North Korean
denuclearization forward.
HIT TO AMERICAN CREDIBILITY
David O'Sullivan, the former EU ambassador to Washington, said Trump
had a "hugely damaging effect" and it would take time to rebuild
America's image and leadership role.
But he had articulated some deeply felt concerns among Americans
about the extent of U.S. overseas involvements and a feeling that
some allies were not pulling their weight.
"There will be no tears shed in Europe if Trump loses the election,"
O'Sullivan said. "This administration has been particularly inept,
and particularly maladroit and, frankly has tended to alienate
allies and give comfort to people who previously have been
considered adversaries.
"Equally, I don't think anyone is under the illusion that a Biden
administration will herald a kind of golden era of European-U.S.
cooperation ... the differences will remain, but we will start from
a point of mutual respect."
O'Sullivan and others said Biden would likely seek to revive the
Iran agreement and Asia trade deal, but not without revisions to
secure the sort of "better deal" Trump often talks about getting.
While relations can be patched up, experts said scars will remain
from Trump's abrasive approach that could affect the willingness of
countries to stick their necks out to follow American leads.
"The fundamental faith in American constancy has been shaken," said
Adam Ereli, a State Department spokesman under George W. Bush and an
ambassador to Bahrain under Obama.
"In the back of their minds will be, 'Could Trump happen again?'"
(Reporting by David Brunnstrom, Humeyra Pamuk and Luke Baker;
Writing by David Brunnstrom; Editing by Mary Milliken and Daniel
Wallis)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |