But the agency has already had to scale back its ambition.
The United States, Japan, Britain and the European Union have struck
their own deals to secure millions of COVID-19 vaccine doses for
their citizens, ignoring the U.N. body’s warnings that "vaccine
nationalism" will squeeze supplies.
If other countries that can afford it pursue a similar approach, the
WHO's strategy for fighting the coronavirus pandemic globally and
equitably risks coming undone, experts warn.
"If that were to happen, it's fairly clear that there would be
insufficient volumes of vaccine available for any other countries,
particularly in the first six to nine months," said Alex Harris,
head of global policy at the Wellcome Trust health charity.
Countries wishing to be part of the WHO initiative, dubbed COVAX,
must submit expressions of interest by Monday.
More than 170 countries, including Canada, Norway, South Korea and
Britain, have submitted non-binding expressions of interest to
participate in the scheme, which the WHO has touted as the only
global initiative to ensure COVID-19 vaccines are available
worldwide to rich and poor countries alike.
It has signed up nine COVID-19 vaccine candidates and set out plans
to obtain and deliver 2 billion doses by the end of 2021 across
countries that sign up.
But it has struggled to get wealthier countries on board in full
beyond pledges of funding and warm words about donating surplus
vaccines.
Last week, WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus criticised nations
that hoard vaccines, warning the strategy will worsen the pandemic.
In a last-ditch call for support ahead of Monday's deadline, he
wrote letters to members urging their participation.
The EU Commission is "fully committed" to the success of COVAX while
it enters into parallel talks with vaccine manufacturers for
supplies for the bloc, a spokeswoman told Reuters.
Britain said it was supporting COVAX to ensure equal access to
vaccines, including funding, while doing its own bilateral supply
deals.
White House did not immediately comment on the situation. The United
States did not participate in the launch of the programme in April
or a fundraising event in May.
DEALMAKING
The EU's aggressive dealmaking for vaccine supplies and tepid
statements about COVAX have in particular undermined the initiative,
which is co-led by the WHO, the GAVI vaccines alliance and the CEPI
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations.
The European Commission is likely to pledge cash for COVAX but it is
also securing its own supply deals for member states, deeming COVAX
too slow and expensive.
Brussels has told countries they can help fund COVAX, but can't seek
to buy vaccines via both schemes, a Commission spokesman said.
Forced to choose, some countries have pulled out of COVAX entirely.
The Czech Republic and Portugal were listed as early backers, but
government support appears to have cooled after joining the EU
vaccine procurement programme.
[to top of second column] |
Prague has opted for the EU programme instead.
Portugal has asked for an initial delivery of 6.9 million doses of vaccine when
the EU programme becomes available, the government has said.
Asked if it would take part in COVAX, a spokesman for the country's drug
regulator INFARMED said it would coordinate its participation in the programme
with other European nations.
Other WHO members, which are already major donors to existing global vaccine
programmes unrelated to COVID-19, are still on the fence too.
Brazil, with the world's second worst coronavirus outbreak outside the United
States, has not yet decided whether to participate, a health ministry
spokeswoman said.
In Japan, deputy Health Minister Hisashi Inatsu said he would like to enter
discussions about participating, but the government has not said if it will
submit an official expression of interest by Monday.
Like many wealthy nations, Japan has ordered its own supply of shots, with
almost 250 millions of doses of potential vaccines booked from AstraZeneca <AZN.L>,
Pfizer <PFE.N> and BioNTech <BNTX.O>.
RADICAL DEPARTURE
Officials say both COVAX and government deals can run in parallel, but that's a
radical departure from the original plan outlined in the spring.
In acting alone, countries will create "a few winners and many losers", Richard
Hatchett, CEO of CEPI, warned on Monday.
It also means poorer or less powerful countries may go to the back of the queue
for vaccines that could help them control the pandemic.
"The risk is that access to COVID-19 vaccines will be defined by purchasing
power and the ability to sign advance purchase deals rather than the medical
needs or the shifting epidemiological situations," said Dimitri Eynikel, EU
representative on medicines and vaccines for Doctors Without Borders.
The initiative is all the more significant for the WHO as scrutiny grows on its
handling of the pandemic. The results of the first round will highlight the
challenge of tackling a global crisis with competing individual interests.
One senior European government official explained the dilemma facing wealthy
nations: how to support a vaccine for developing countries when there may not be
enough for your own population. Diverting resources abroad "is difficult to sell
at home", he said.
(Reporting by Andreas Rinke in Berlin, Catarina Demony in Lisbon, Rocky Swift in
Tokyo, Anthony Boadle in Brasilia, Alistair Smout in London, Victoria Klesty in
Oslo, Anne Kauranen in Helsinki, John Miller in Zurich, Kelsey Johnson in
Ottawa, Sangmi Cha in Seoul and Jeff Mason in Washington; Writing by Josephine
Mason; Editing by Giles Elgood)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |