U.S. Supreme Court takes up Trump bid to revive Medicaid work
requirements
Send a link to a friend
[December 05, 2020]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court on Friday agreed to hear a bid by President Donald Trump's
administration to revive pilot programs adopted by the states of
Arkansas and New Hampshire that allow work requirements to be imposed on
people who receive healthcare under the Medicaid program for the poor.
The justices took up the administration's appeals of rulings by a lower
court that found the work requirement programs to be unlawful. The case
potentially could become moot once Democratic President-elect Joe Biden
takes office on Jan. 20. Seventeen other states are pursuing similar
policies.
"The Biden administration can certainly change this policy, and we hope
that will happen," said Jane Perkins, legal director of the National
Health Law Program, a healthcare advocacy group.
The administration said in court papers that the appeals court rulings
cast a legal shadow on the efforts in those other states to adopt work
requirements for Medicaid, a state-federal program that provides medical
insurance for the poor. New Hampshire and Arkansas filed court papers in
support of the administration.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in 2018 approved those
projects as part of a push to put a conservative stamp on Medicaid,
which was expanded in 37 states and the District of Columbia following
the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, to
help provide coverage to millions more Americans.
Under the Republican Trump, the department gave the go-ahead for states
to carry out test projects requiring able-bodied people on Medicaid to
work or do volunteer work.
The approval of the waivers prompted lawsuits by residents enrolled in
various states' Medicaid programs, including ones in Arkansas and New
Hampshire.
[to top of second column]
|
A cherub figure with a book, symbolizing learning, is seen in a
general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S.
July 2, 2020. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
U.S. District Judge James Boasberg in 2019 struck down the agency's
approval of the Arkansas program, called Arkansas Works. Boasberg
later used the same reasoning in rejecting New Hampshire's work
requirements.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in
February upheld Boasberg's decision in the Arkansas case, saying HHS
failed to adequately consider the extent to which the state's
requirements would cause people to lose healthcare coverage. The
D.C. Circuit reached the same conclusion for the New Hampshire
program in a May ruling.
In court papers, Trump's administration argued that a federal law
called the Social Security Act specifically allowed HHS to approve
any experimental or pilot project that is likely to assist in
promoting the objectives of Medicaid.
The D.C. Circuit ruled that Medicaid has "one primary purpose, which
is providing healthcare coverage without any restriction geared to
healthy outcomes, financial independence or transition to commercial
coverage." The court noted that 18,000 people - about a quarter of
those subject to the requirement - lost their coverage in the first
five months after Arkansas Works was put in place.
(Additional reporting by Nate Raymond; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|