Texas asks U.S. Supreme Court to help Trump upend election in long-shot
lawsuit
Send a link to a friend
[December 09, 2020]
By Makini Brice
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The state of Texas on
Tuesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to throw out the voting results in
four other states in a long-shot legal gambit intended to help President
Donald Trump upend his election loss to President-elect Joe Biden.
Officials from the four states - Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and
Wisconsin - called the lawsuit a reckless attack on democracy while
legal experts gave it little chance to succeed. It was filed directly
with the Supreme Court rather than with a lower court, as is permitted
for certain litigation between states.
The lawsuit, announced by the Republican attorney general of Texas Ken
Paxton, targeted election battleground states that Trump lost to Biden
after winning them in 2016. The Republican president has falsely claimed
he won re-election and has made baseless allegations of widespread
voting fraud.
Paul Smith, a professor and election law expert at Georgetown
University's law school, said Texas did not have a legitimate basis for
the suit.
"There is no possible way that the state of Texas has standing to
complain about how other states counted the votes and how they are about
to cast their electoral votes," Smith said.
The lawsuit represents the latest in a series brought by the Republican
president's campaign and supporters intended to reverse his loss to
Democrat Biden in the Nov. 3 election. Those efforts so far have failed.
In another case, the Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a bid by
Pennsylvania Republicans to block the state from formalizing Biden's
victory there.
The Texas suit argued that changes made by the four states to voting
procedures amid the coronavirus pandemic to expand mail-in voting were
unlawful. Texas makes the remarkable request of the Supreme Court to
immediately block the four states from using the voting results to
appoint presidential electors to the Electoral College, essentially
erasing the will of the voters.
Biden has amassed 306 electoral votes - exceeding the necessary 270 -
compared to Trump's 232 in the state-by-state Electoral College that
determines the election's outcome, while also winning the national
popular vote by more than 7 million votes. The four states contribute a
combined 62 electoral votes to Biden's total.
Electors in the Electoral College typically are party loyalists who
pledge to vote for the candidate who wins a state's popular vote. Texas
wants the legislatures in the four states to appoint their own slate of
electors instead of relying upon the verdict delivered by voters.
Texas also asked the Supreme Court to delay the Dec. 14 date for
Electoral College votes to be cast, a date set by law in 1887.
Democrats and other critics have accused Trump of aiming to reduce
public confidence in U.S. election integrity and undermine democracy by
trying to subvert the will of the voters.
"The erosion of confidence in our democratic system isn't attributable
to the good people of Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia or Pennsylvania but
rather to partisan officials, like Mr. Paxton, who place loyalty to a
person over loyalty to their country," Michigan's Democratic Attorney
General Dana Nessel said.
[to top of second column]
|
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton speaks outside the U.S. Supreme
Court after justices heard arguments in a challenge by 26 states
over the constitutionality of President Barack Obama's executive
action to defer deportation of certain immigrant children and
parents who are in the country illegally in Washington, D.C., U.S.
April 18, 2016. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
Paxton, an ally of Trump on a range of issues, faces allegations in
Texas of bribery and abuse of his office to benefit a political
donor, according to local media.
A CONSERVATIVE COURT MAJORITY
The Supreme Court's 6-3 conservative majority includes three
justices named by Trump. The president said before the election he
expected the Supreme Court to decide the winner.
The justices are not obligated to hear the case. The court has made
clear that its "original jurisdiction," which lets it directly hear
litigation between states, should be invoked sparingly.
Texas accused election officials in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania
and Wisconsin of failing to protect mail-in voting from fraud,
diminishing "the weight of votes cast in states that lawfully abide
by the election structure set forth in the Constitution."
Voting by mail surged during the pandemic, as many Americans stayed
away from polling places to avoid the spread of COVID-19. State
officials have said they have found no evidence of the widespread
election fraud alleged by Trump.
Election disputes are meant to be resolved by members of Congress
when they meet on Jan. 6 to formally count Electoral College votes,
constitutional law professor Ned Foley of Ohio State University's
Moritz College of Law said.
"I would think the court would not want to be dragged into the
middle of this," Foley added.
Trump retweeted several Twitter posts expressing support for the
lawsuit, including two that called for other states to join it.
Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, said, "These
continued attacks on our fair and free election system are beyond
meritless, beyond reckless." Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a
Democrat, called the lawsuit "genuinely embarrassing."
A spokeswoman for the office of Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr,
a Republican, said: "With all due respect, the Texas Attorney
General is constitutionally, legally and factually wrong about
Georgia."
Tuesday represented a "safe harbor" early deadline under the law for
states to certify the election results.
(Reporting by Makini Brice, Jan Wolfe and Lawrence Hurley in
Washington; Additional reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington,
Delaware; Editing by Will Dunham and Noeleen Walder)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|