Biden's agriculture secretary pick disappoints Black farmers
Send a link to a friend
[December 12, 2020]
By Christopher Walljasper
CHICAGO (Reuters) - President-elect Joe
Biden has promised to address racial inequality in agriculture. But some
Black farmers aren't so sure he picked the right man for the job after
settling on former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack for agriculture secretary.
Vilsack led the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) under former
President Barack Obama. His likely return to the post comes at a time of
racial reckoning in the United States, and Black voters won't soon
forget they helped deliver Biden's victory.
Biden's transition team has said Vilsack's prior experience as USDA
chief offers a head start in addressing issues facing the new
administration.
"With how many farmers are struggling, the president-elect has been
prioritizing experienced leaders – people he knows can hit the ground on
day one to get things done," said Sean Savett, spokesman for the Biden
transition team.
But Black farmers, who have long viewed the department suspiciously, say
Vilsack comes back to his old job carrying plenty of baggage.
"USDA has historically not demonstrated a commitment to racial justice,
and we particularly see the track record of Vilsack in the past," said
Dara Cooper, co-founder of the National Black Food and Justice Alliance.
"That’s what caused a great concern," said Cooper, whose organization
focuses on equitable access to food and land for Black farmers and
communities.
Cooper's group, as well as the National Black Farmers Association, say
alleged discriminatory practices continued at the USDA while under
Vilsack's leadership, including the denial of loans to Black farmers and
a decrease in the percentage of dollars loaned to minority farmers.
Vilsack declined to comment but said during the announcement of his
nomination Friday he was committed to "rooting out inequities and
systemic racism in the systems we govern and the programs we lead."
Many groups representing Black farmers endorsed Biden, who has pledged
to "close racial wealth gaps – including for rural Americans of color."
But John Boyd Jr., a farmer and president of the National Black Farmers
Association, voiced surprise that Biden picked Vilsack for the USDA over
someone like Ohio congresswoman Marcia Fudge, a vocal proponent of
increased nutrition funding for black communities and addressing racial
discrimination.
[to top of second column]
|
Former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack, U.S. President-elect Joe Biden's
nominee to be Secretary of Agriculture, speaks after Biden announced
his nomination among another round of nominees and appointees for
his administration during a news conference at his transition
headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., December 11, 2020.
REUTERS/Mike Segar
"In my one-on-one meeting with him (Biden), he committed that there
would be change at USDA for Black farmers," Boyd said.
Fudge, who would have been the first Black woman to lead the agency,
reached out to Boyd in late November to discuss issues critical to
Black farmers, he said. Vilsack contacted him on Thursday, he added,
after the announcement of his selection.
Biden's transition team has announced Fudge will run the Department
of Housing and Urban Development.
Among other past issues, Vilsack forced Shirley Sherrod, a Black
woman, to resign from her position as Georgia state director of
rural development for the USDA in 2010, due to an edited tape of a
speech that misconstrued Sherrod’s statements as prejudicial against
white farmers.
Vilsack later apologized and offered Sherrod a new position, which
she declined.
Vilsack's nomination follows Georgia lawmaker David Scott’s
selection as the first African American to chair the House
Agriculture Committee. Scott has pledged to back a proposal from
U.S. Senators Cory Booker and Elizabeth Warren that would provide
grants to Black farmers to purchase farmland and protect them from
further losses.
Discriminatory lending practices, often at local USDA offices,
denied Black farmers access to funds needed to operate, maintain and
purchase farmland, leading to a loss of $120 billion in farmland
value, according to a 2018 analysis by Melissa Gordon of Tufts
University.
"We talk about the wrongs of the USDA as if it were in the past, but
the reality is that they still continue, so there has to be some
drastic overhaul," said Cooper.
(Reporting by Christopher Walljasper; Editing by Caroline Stauffer
and Tom Brown)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |