Biden will keep using U.S. sanctions weapon but with sharper aim -
sources
Send a link to a friend
[December 16, 2020]
By Matt Spetalnick, Daphne Psaledakis, Humeyra Pamuk and Trevor
Hunnicutt
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Joe Biden will not
shy away from using President Donald Trump's weapon of choice -
sanctions - as he seeks to reshape America's foreign policy, according
to people familiar with his thinking.
But when Biden takes office on Jan. 20, he is expected to quickly begin
recalibrating Trump's blunt-force approach while taking time to
deliberate before making any major changes with top sanctions targets
like Iran and China, the sources said.
His challenge will be to sort out which sanctions to keep, which to undo
and which to expand. This will come after four years in which Trump has
imposed punitive economic measures at a record pace – often unilaterally
- but has failed to bend U.S. rivals to his will.
The revised strategy will be crafted with help from a broad review of
sanctions programs that will begin soon after Biden’s inauguration, the
sources said on condition of anonymity.
But even before this assessment is complete, Biden is expected to make
clear that sanctions will remain a central instrument of U.S. power -
although it will no longer be deployed with the “America First” bravado
that has driven Trump’s foreign policy.
“It won’t be a pullback or a push forward,” said one person close to
Biden’s transition team. “It will be a readjustment in the use of the
sanctions tool.”
Among the early possibilities, according to two sources, could be
lifting sanctions Trump imposed in September on officials of the
International Criminal Court over its investigation into whether the
U.S. military committed war crimes in Afghanistan, a move denounced by
European allies.
Biden could also match British and European Union sanctions against
Russians over the poisoning of Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny, said one
person familiar with the matter. Moscow has denied any involvement.
Biden's team had no official comment.
PILING ON NEW SANCTIONS
Adding to Biden’s challenges, Trump has kept up a drum beat of sanctions
in the chaotic, waning days of his administration. He has imposed
measures that could make it harder for his successor to return to a
landmark nuclear deal with Iran and to quickly establish a working
relationship with China after Communist Party officials were targeted.
Since taking office, Trump has employed sanctions as his go-to response
to international problems ranging from Iran’s military activities to
North Korea’s nuclear arsenal to Venezuela’s political crisis.
The Trump administration has issued around 3,800 new sanctions
“designations” compared with 2,350 in President Barack Obama’s second
term, while approving far fewer delistings, the means by which
Washington rewards those who change behavior, according to figures
compiled by the Center for a New American Security think tank.
At the same time, his administration has pioneered the imposition of
U.S. visa bans, hitting more than 200 foreign officials with travel
sanctions rarely used before Trump, and has sharply escalated the use of
so-called secondary sanctions that have punished friends as well as
foes.
While Biden is expected to continue robust use of such coercive
measures, there will be changes, including more deliberative
decision-making and closer coordination with allies, the sources said.
“Sanctions are not a silver bullet,” said Hagar Hajjar Chemali, who
served as a sanctions officer under Obama. “They need to be deployed as
part of a broader strategy, and this is what has often been lacking with
the Trump administration.”
Trump officials insist that this flexing of U.S. economic muscle has
inflicted serious damage to some of America’s foes that could provide
leverage for Biden.
But those governments show no signs of giving in to Trump’s demands.
Iran, despite Trump’s restoration of U.S. sanctions, refuses to
renegotiate the nuclear deal he abandoned. Venezuela’s socialist
President Nicolas Maduro has defied efforts to oust him. North Korea
continues to build up its nuclear arsenal.
And China also has appeared unmoved by a barrage of sanctions over
technology, Hong Kong, the South China Sea and the crackdown on its
Muslim minority.
Some critics have questioned Trump’s expansion of individual sanctions,
the blacklisting of foreign officials with asset freezes and
prohibitions on Americans doing business with them. Such moves can be
effective when targets are wealthy or invested in the United States but
mostly symbolic when they are not.
Biden’s aides worry that the perceived overuse of sanctions could
backfire, especially if it spurs other countries to develop mechanisms
to circumvent U.S.-dominated financial networks.
'LASER-FOCUSED'
Still, Biden’s choice of Antony Blinken as secretary of state and Jake
Sullivan as national security adviser suggests that while he will be
multilateral in using sanctions, there will not be much of a letup.
Adewale Adeyemo, the incoming number two official at Treasury, vowed
this month to be “laser-focused” on national security, including “using
our sanctions regime to hold bad actors accountable.” He will lead
Biden’s sanctions evaluation, multiple sources said.
[to top of second column]
|
President-elect Joe Biden speaks as Vice President-elect Kamala
Harris stands by in Wilmington, Delaware, U.S., November 16, 2020.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
Iran is likely to be Biden’s biggest sanctions dilemma.
He has said he would return to the nuclear deal – which Trump left
in 2018 despite opposition from European allies - if Iran resumes
compliance. Iran has put the onus on the new administration to act
first and may seek concessions.
While it will be hard for Biden to offer Iran significant sanctions
relief anytime soon, he could create an opening for re-engagement by
easing restrictions that have impeded Iran’s access to humanitarian
goods amid the coronavirus pandemic, according to the person close
to his team.
Sanctions as part of Trump’s “maximum pressure” campaign have driven
down the OPEC nation's oil revenues and crippled foreign trade. Iran
has been hurt by being frozen out of the U.S. financial system. Most
countries and companies have shied away because of concern they
themselves will be sanctioned for doing business with Tehran.
Even so, Trump has continued piling on new measures over Tehran’s
human rights, missile development and support for militants that
will be politically difficult for Biden to unwind.
“There’s a rush of actions as this administration heads toward the
exits … to cause more economic pain, set back Iran’s nuclear program
and complicate Biden’s path forward,” said Robert Malley, who served
as Obama’s Iran adviser and has informally advised Biden’s team.
But Trump officials counter that they are actually doing Biden a
favor by putting Iran under so much economic duress that it will
have no choice but to return to negotiations.
"No, no, no, no,” Elliott Abrams, Trump's envoy on Iran and
Venezuela, told Reuters when asked whether the purpose of stepped-up
Iran sanctions was to box Biden in. “It strengthens their hand.”
Moreover, he insisted sanctioning Iran and other adversaries
represents a better option than the alternatives: “One is the use of
military force. Another is give up, walk away.”
TOUGHER ON HUMAN RIGHTS
Biden will also face the question of what to do about sanctions on
China, the world’s second-biggest economy.
While Trump charged during the election campaign that Biden would
sell out to Beijing, the president-elect has said he will take a
tougher stand, especially on human rights.
This will likely mean further sanctions over Hong Kong, China’s
Xinjiang region and possibly Tibet, the person close to Biden’s
transition team said.
But one Biden adviser, speaking on condition of anonymity, suggested
that the sanctions threat could also be used to help pressure China
to resolve trade disputes.
Among Biden’s challenges with North Korea will be to clear up
confusion over Trump’s policy and shore up sanctions enforcement
aimed at compelling it to give up nuclear weapons.
Trump’s “bromance” with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has
undermined international sanctions pressure, experts say, although
Pyongyang remains economically debilitated by restrictions on access
to the global financial and trade system.
Biden has branded Kim a “thug,” and advisers predict a sterner
approach.
Biden has also signaled possible sanctions on Russia over election
meddling, and the newly exposed breach of federal agencies’
computers could give further impetus. He could act, as well, on an
issue Trump has been reluctant to tackle: intelligence assessments
that Russia offered bounties to militants to kill U.S and allied
soldiers in Afghanistan, two sources said.
At home, Biden will face the challenge of repairing the government’s
sanctions apparatus. Inter-agency collaboration has often been
neglected amid Trump’s top-down, policymaking-by-tweet, according to
people inside and outside his administration.
This has sown frustration at the State and Treasury Departments,
spurring departures of experienced staff.
“People are overworked and getting burnt out,” said one former
official of Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. “So the
hope is the process will change for the better."
(Reporting by Matt Spetalnick, Daphne Psaledakis and Humeyra Pamuk
in Washington and Trevor Hunnicutt in Wilmington, Delaware; Writing
by Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Mary Milliken and Alistair Bell)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |