Democrats vote to end legislative investigation of Madigan
Send a link to a friend
[December 16, 2020]
By SARAH MANSUR
Capitol News Illinois
smansur@capitolnewsillinois.com
SPRINGFIELD — After just three hearings in
four months, Democrats on the special committee probing House Speaker
Michael Madigan’s alleged misconduct and role in a bribery scheme
involving Commonwealth Edison voted Monday to end their investigation.
Throughout the combative three-hour hearing, the three House Republicans
and three Democrats clashed repeatedly over the rules of procedure,
disagreed about the facts contained in the federal court documents and
levied accusations of political stunts and a “kangaroo court.”
The House Democratic members — Reps. Chris Welch, of Hillside, Natalie
Manley, of Joliet, and Elizabeth Hernandez, of Cicero — voted no on a
motion, presented by Manley, that Madigan engaged in conduct unbecoming
of legislator.
With a deadlocked vote along party lines, the motion failed to pass.
Madigan issued a statement on Monday that criticized his Republican
counterpart, Minority Leader Rep. Jim Durkin of Western Springs, who
filed the petition creating the committee.
“Jim Durkin insisted on initiating this political theater, and through
this process we’ve come to learn that he was involved in the very
conduct he claims to be so offended by – recommending people for various
jobs. If Jim Durkin actually believes it is conduct unbecoming of a
legislator to recommend people for jobs or help constituents, he might
want to review his own hypocritical behavior. Rather than finger
pointing, I suggest we focus on the important work that lies ahead of
us,” Madigan said in the statement.
The Special Investigating Committee was formed in late August after the
U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago charged ComEd in a deferred
prosecution agreement that alleged ComEd officials conspired with
Madigan’s associates to secure no-work jobs and contracts for Madigan’s
friends in exchange for favorable legislation in the Illinois General
Assembly.
The committee was tasked with investigating whether there was evidence
to find Madigan’s conduct was unbecoming of a legislator and whether
Madigan should face disciplinary proceedings.
Under the deferred prosecution agreement, ComEd admitted to the bribery
scheme and agreed to pay a $200 million and cooperate with the
investigation.
Madigan has not been charged with a crime and he denies wrongdoing. He
is mentioned in the deferred prosecution agreement and indictments as
“Public Official A.”
In September, a former ComEd executive, Fidel Marquez, pleaded guilty to
a role in the bribery scheme. Last month, federal prosecutors in Chicago
indicted four others — Michael McClain, a former ComEd lobbyist and
close Madigan confidant, former ComEd CEO Anne Pramaggiore, former ComEd
executive John Hooker, and Jay Doherty, a lobbyist who worked on
contract for ComEd — with bribery for allegedly conspiring to influence
Madigan with no-work jobs and contracts to his associates.
Last month, Welch released hundreds of pages of documents that the
committee had requested from ComEd, including numerous emails between
McClain and Marquez, Pramaggiore and others seeking favors for Madigan’s
associates and individuals from his district.
The Republicans on the investigating committee — Reps. Tom Demmer, of
Dixon, Deanne Mazzochi, of Elmhurst, and Grant Werhli, of Naperville —
extensively referenced the emails to show McClain was working on behalf
of Madigan, and with Madigan’s knowledge, to secure jobs, contracts and
internships that were meant to curry favor with the Speaker.
“This was not a mere job recommendation, this was a demand,” Mazzochi
said in reference to an email from McClain instructing ComEd officials
to add former CEO of the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority Juan
Ochoa to the ComEd Board of Directors at the request of Madigan.
Other emails show McClain asking the company to provide work for
attorney Victor Reyes and his law firm, Reyes Kurson, again at the
request of Madigan, who is referred to as “our Friend.”
[to top of second column]
|
Rep. Emanuel "Chris" Welch, D-Hillside, speaks at the end of a
Special Investigating Committee into alleged misconduct of House
Speaker Michael Madigan as Rep. Grant Wehrli, R-Naperville, looks on
in the foreground. The committee's Democrats voted to end the
investigation Monday after just three meetings in four months.
(Credit: Blueroomstream.com)
In one email, McClain wrote, “I am sure you know how valuable
[Reyes] is to our Friend,” and then went on to write, “I know the
drill and so do you. If you do not get involve [sic] and resolve
this issue of 850 hours for his law firm per year then he will go to
our Friend. Our Friend will call me and then I will call you. Is
this a drill we must go through?”
Mazzochi said the exchange was “not a job recommendation. That is an
unethical quid pro quo.”
“These internal documents certainly confirm that there is no
innocent explanation,” she said.
The three Republican House members of the committee called for
additional witnesses to appear before them, including those named in
the federal indictment, but a motion to issue subpoenas failed to
pass, with a partisan vote deadlocked at 3-3.
In a news conference after the committee adjourned, Demmer said the
Democrats on the House committee shut down their investigation.
“It was our duty to conduct this investigation to support and try to
rebuild the integrity and trust of the House of Representatives. But
what we saw under the leadership of Chairman Welch was a process
that sought not to hear from additional witnesses, sought not to
have adequate number of hearings and sought to bring the committee
to a conclusion before we had the information necessary to make a
qualified judgment,” Demmer said.
The committee met twice in September, and has heard testimony from
only one witness, David Glockner, the executive vice president of
compliance and audit for Exelon Corporation, which is the parent
company of ComEd.
Democrats on the committee also used the emails to suggest Durkin
improperly sought ComEd jobs for his friends, citing an email from a
lobbyist for the Illinois State Medical Society that asked McClain
to consider recommending a woman who had been working in Durkin’s
office.
Hernandez, along with her Democratic colleagues, maintained that
McClain’s emails simply showed someone making job recommendations.
“Recommending jobs is legal, and Leader Durkin asked for job
recommendations too,” she said. “In neither case is this illegal or
unethical.”
Furthermore, Democrats claimed that the committee’s motive was a
power grab by Durkin in an effort to become the next House Speaker,
even though he would need the votes of at least 15 House Democrats
to be elected to the position.
“This is a political show that was concocted by Minority Leader
Durkin. It was a plain power grab by the minority party, as the
Republican members of this committee and petitioner have shown in
spite of our attempts to conduct this investigation in a nonpartisan
impartial manner,” Welch said during a news conference following the
committee’s adjournment.
In his own statement Monday, Durkin criticized the Democratic
members of the committee for protecting Madigan.
“The Democratic Party shows again today there is no limit to the
lengths they will go to protect Speaker Madigan. Chairman Welch,
Rep. Hernandez and Rep. Manley have turned the rule of law on its
head by refusing to investigate the charges and demand the testimony
of Speaker Madigan in this scandal. I call on Governor Pritzker to
finally demand Speaker Madigan resign as it is clear he refuses to
answer any questions about his corrupt practices,” the statement
reads.
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan
news service covering state government and distributed to more than
400 newspapers statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois
Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation. |