Factbox-What's new with the Fed's 2020 bank stress
tests?
Send a link to a friend
[December 17, 2020] By
Pete Schroeder
WASHINGTON, December 17 (Reuters) - The
Federal Reserve's bank stress tests have been significantly different in
2020, thanks to regulatory changes and the dramatic economic turmoil
brought on by coronavirus pandemic.
Since the decade-ago financial crisis, the Fed has run one set of tests
annually, but on Friday it will reveal the results of its second test
this year. Here's how the annual exam of bank health have changed.
'SENSITIVITY ANALYSES'
Originally, the Fed planned to test bank capital plans against a
hypothetical economic downturn it published in February. The coronavirus
outbreak upended those plans, as the economic hit caused by widespread
lockdowns quickly dwarfed the downturn envisioned by the test.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbeea/cbeea93e1c757922c6a0dc4c45c70752486995fb" alt=""
So in May, the Fed added "sensitivity analyses" to the test to capture
"current economic conditions." Those results, which were released in two
stages in June and then August, found that banks could weather heavy
capital losses should the economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic
drag on.
The Fed also said in June it would run a second set of tests at the end
of the year, given the severity of the economic slump. In September, it
revealed that the test would comprise two hypothetical recessions -- a
severe but short-lived decline and a more moderate, but longer-lasting
downturn.
NO MORE 'PASS/FAIL'
Previously, the Fed would pass a bank's capital plan, or reject it and
order fixes. The high drama of the public fail meant a lot of angst for
bank executives, wary of an investor backlash. Fed officials too had
expressed a desire to devise a less volatile way to shape bank capital
plans.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c6a7/2c6a73691f1d6d36eaa79f9e3493119f97b6ab37" alt=""
The Federal Reserve building is set against a blue sky in
Washington, U.S., May 1, 2020. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c19f2/c19f20f5ae63d7efd0999bf5a18039983a9eb7ac" alt=""
So, for the first time, the Fed this year scrapped the pass/fail, and adopted a
more nuanced approach.
NEW 'STRESS CAPITAL BUFFER'
That new approach is called a "stress capital buffer," meant to combine existing
capital requirements with each bank's stress test results. Instead of passing or
failing, each bank is told how much capital they will have to hold in addition
to the minimum buffers dictated by the test.
The Fed released those customized capital plans in August for implementation by
October. [L1N2FC0FT]
DIVIDEND PRESSURE
Another complication this year is the political pressure the Fed has been under
to curtail bank dividends and share buybacks.
Earlier in the year, Fed Vice Chairman Randal Quarles was pressed by Democrats
in Congress to order banks to hold onto that capital rather than give it to
investors.
In June, the Fed ordered banks to cap dividends and bar share repurchases
through year end to ensure lenders have sufficient cushions. Friday's results
will dictate whether those curbs continue into 2021.
(Reporting by Pete Schroeder; editing by Edward Tobin and Alexandra Hudson)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |