Attorney General files lawsuit
seeking to end illegal Google monopoly
Send a link to a friend
[December 18, 2020]
Attorney General Kwame Raoul today joined a bipartisan coalition of
38 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit against Google LLC,
alleging that the company illegally maintains its monopoly power
over general search engines and related advertising markets through
a series of anticompetitive, exclusionary contracts and conduct. The
lawsuit alleges that Google has deprived consumers of competition
that could lead to greater choice, innovation and better privacy
protections. Furthermore, Raoul and the coalition allege that Google
has exploited its market position to accumulate and leverage data to
the detriment of consumers.
“For years, Google has engaged in anticompetitive behavior and
conduct to illegally maintain its monopoly as an online search
engine,” Raoul said. “Google’s actions have not only negatively
affected competition, advertisers, and business, but have also
risked the privacy of consumers and left them with few alternatives
to Google’s platform. Consumers deserve to have a choice and the
confidence that they are getting the best search results, not just
the results that Google wants them to see. I am joining my
colleagues in this lawsuit to ask the court to end Google’s monopoly
and remove the barriers it created for potential competitors.”
The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District
of Columbia, in conjunction with a motion to consolidate seeking to
combine the states’ case with a similar, pending U.S Department of
Justice (DOJ) case. Google is specifically charged with violating
Section 2 of the Sherman Act.
In the complaint, Raoul and the coalition allege that Google:
Uses exclusionary agreements and other practices to limit the
ability of rival general search engines and potential rivals to
reach consumers. This conduct cements Google as the go-to search
engine on computers and mobile devices.
Disadvantages users of its search-advertising management
tool, SA360, by promising that it would not favor Google search
advertising over that of competing search engines such as Bing.
Instead, Google continuously favors advertising on its own platform,
inflating its profits to the detriment of advertisers and consumers.
[to top of second column] |
Discriminates against specialized search sites – such as those that
provide travel, home repair, or entertainment services – by depriving them of
access to prime real estate because these competing sites threaten Google’s
revenue and dominant position.
Raoul and the coalition also argue that more competition in the general search
engine market would benefit consumers through improved privacy protections and
more targeted results and opportunities for consumers. Competitive general
search engines also could offer better-quality advertising and lower prices to
advertisers. The complaint further alleges that the company seeks to deploy the
same exclusionary contracting tactics to monopolize the emerging ways consumers
access general search engines, such as through their home smart speakers,
televisions, or in cars.
The attorneys general also expand on the DOJ’s complaint to explain that
Google’s acquisition and command of vast amounts of data – obtained increasingly
because of consumers’ lack of choice – has fortified Google’s monopoly and
created significant barriers for potential competitors and innovators.
In today’s lawsuit, Raoul and the coalition seek to stop Google’s illegal
conduct and restore a competitive marketplace, and unwind any advantages that
Google gained as a result of its anticompetitive conduct, including divestiture
of assets as appropriate. Finally, they ask the court to provide any additional
relief it determines appropriate, as well as reasonable fees and costs to the
states.
Joining Raoul in today’s lawsuit is a bipartisan group of attorneys general from
Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia,
Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode
Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West
Virginia and Wyoming.
[Office of the Illinois Attorney
General] |