The halt was due to J&J's decision, announced later on that same day
on Dec. 9, to cap the number of participants at about 40,000 people
globally, down from a previous plan for 60,000.
The drugmaker said that a surge in coronavirus cases in the areas it
was testing would give it enough data to vet the vaccine.
Wrapping up recruitment more quickly - while continuing to monitor
volunteers already participating - would keep J&J on target to seek
U.S. authorization for the shot early next year, the company has
said, if it proves successful against a virus that has already
killed nearly 1.7 million people.
J&J told Reuters it would not comment on its enrollment beyond a
Friday statement that said the trial had closed.
But the move has raised questions, and sparked disappointment, for
some in Latin America, according to interviews with a dozen
researchers, government officials and disease experts.
Dr Miguel O'Ryan, leader of trials in three medical centers in and
around Santiago, Chile, told Reuters his trials were abruptly closed
to new volunteers after his team of 50 doctors and nurses had rushed
to find people willing to take part in each age group.
Researchers had been left "furious" that they weren't given any
prior warning and had to let down hundreds of people already
scheduled to participate, he said.
"At first they contact you, say they want all this, you get geared
up and then overnight they tell you 'that's it,'" he said. "You
understand the need to be more flexible... but it is hard for the
research community in a study like this when the rules of the game
change so quickly."
Peru, Chile, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil and Colombia had all offered
to participate in the trial, hoping that would give them
preferential access to J&J's vaccine in the global race to stockpile
doses. J&J told Reuters in September that those hosting trials would
have priority for vaccine supply.
Now some in government circles and the public health community fear
those deals could be compromised. And local researchers have been
left wondering whether they will be fully compensated for their
investment in incomplete trials.
J&J has not provided details on where the cap in numbers would
impact most. The company did not comment on the status of supply
deals or on compensation arrangements for researchers.
The drugmaker expects an initial analysis of the data by late
January. If the trial proves successful, the company plans to seek
U.S. authorization in February.
SEEKING SUPPLY
To date, none of the six countries in Latin America participating in
the trial has finalized a vaccine supply agreement with J&J, even
though they still do not have enough doses from other vaccine makers
to inoculate all of their citizens. Health officials in all six
countries said that negotiations were still in progress.
Albert Ko, professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Public
Health, who has extensive disease research experience in Latin
America, said ensuring both rich and poor countries had good access
to vaccines was a "key social justice issue for the world."
"Countries in Latin America, as they are establishing trial sites,
need to pressure for these deals when they are negotiating with the
industry. But also it's on the companies," he said.
Ko cited the approach of AstraZeneca Plc to helping less wealthy
nations produce and distribute its COVID-19 vaccine candidate,
developed with Oxford University.
AstraZeneca's vaccine is viewed as one of the best hopes for many
developing countries because of its cheaper price and ability to be
transported at normal fridge temperatures.
J&J turned to Latin America when infection rates there spiked, as a
way to accelerate testing of the vaccine and gauge its effectiveness
in diverse populations. The drugmaker shared its plans for the
region with Reuters in September, saying it aimed to enroll 20,000
participants in the six countries by November.
The J&J vaccine is easier to transport and store and is administered
in a single shot, unlike vaccines from front-runners Pfizer Inc and
Moderna Inc, which are delivered in two doses.
J&J has signed an agreement in principle to provide the COVAX
vaccine program with up to 500 million doses of its vaccine through
2022 for distribution to lower income countries.
"This vaccine would be a game changer because of that single dose,
not just for Latin America but for Asia, South Asia, sub-Saharan
Africa and much of the world," said Ko. "Two doses is exponentially
more difficult to administer. I would think countries would jump on
this if a safe and effective one-dose vaccine comes onboard."
[to top of second column] |
Brazil has signed non-binding
letters of intent to purchase vaccines from four
companies including J&J, with health officials
indicating a preference for the J&J single-dose
shot.
Mexico's Deputy Health Minister Hugo Lopez-Gatell
said earlier this month at a news conference
that hosting the Janssen trial would give the
country priority access to the vaccine. Foreign
secretary Marcelo Ebrard said last week Mexico
could order 22 million doses under a memorandum
of understanding. The Mexican
government declined to comment on the halting of trial recruitment
and the likelihood now of a priority vaccine supply deal.
A Peruvian government source told Reuters that new deals could be
announced in the coming days, but declined to comment on which
companies they could involve.
The source said that there were constant surprises in the
fast-moving negotiations taking place between governments and
pharmaceutical companies around the world in the race to lock in
deals, with intense and regular back-and-forth around price,
quantity, delivery times and contractual conditions.
"Things change so fast that I could tell you something now and
tomorrow it will be outdated," he said. FAMILY
AFFAIR
During a conference call that Janssen - J&J's pharmaceuticals
division - convened with scientists from 100 Latin American trial
sites on Dec. 9, local researchers, who had been working at full
speed to help the company meet its ambitious goals, voiced their
anger at the sudden announcement they should now wrap up their
operations when their target volunteer numbers were not yet met and
they had hundreds of people scheduled to be screened and vaccinated,
according to two participants.
J&J in the statement issued on Friday expressed "its thanks to all
participants, trial sites and health care professionals involved in
the ENSEMBLE study." It did not comment on the angry reaction over
the conference call.
In all, the Latin American sites appear to have enrolled about
16,000 people, according to a Reuters tally of figures reported by
trial leaders and governments.
Any shortfall would be meaningful for individual research sites, who
are paid based on the number of people they recruit. Reuters could
not determine the range of what researchers are paid, which varies
depending on a number of factors, including their specific
locations, third-party partners and target size of trials.
The urgency to sign people up quickly was evident at a site in
Colina, Chile, late November, where a Reuters journalist was among
the dozens of volunteers who moved along the queue in a narrow
waiting room.
Most of those volunteering were medical workers, the worst-hit by
the pandemic, and their families. Trial staff also signed up their
own families and friends to help make their numbers, they told
Reuters.
The start of trials in Chile, Peru and Mexico were delayed by
several weeks, held up by factors like regulatory scrutiny,
technical glitches and a scramble to get supplies.
In Brazil, the effort began without a hitch in October, with people
from all walks of life taking part, said a researcher.
"There were thousands who volunteered. People are very enthusiastic
to help and put up with long waits," said Eduardo Vasconcellos,
trial leader at the L2iP clinical research institute in Brasilia.
Alejandra Camino, a trial investigator at privately-run DIM health
clinics in the Argentine capital Buenos Aires, said that, although
the abrupt end to enrollment was not ideal, it was important to
remain flexible in the fight against COVID-19.
"It's a disappointment because if you set it up and found a venue,
your operation is now going to be out of pocket," she said of her
colleagues' work on their trials. "But we are talking about a
pandemic."
(Reporting by Aislinn Laing in Santiago; Additional reporting by
Marco Aquino in Peru, Julia Symmes Cobb in Bogota, Anthony Boadle in
Brasilia, Eliana Raszewski in Buenos Aires and Anthony Esposito in
Mexico City; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Rosalba O'Brien)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |