U.S. District Judge Rodney Smith ruled in favor of Corellium
LLC, saying its software emulating the iOS operating system that
runs on the iPhone and iPad amounted to "fair use" because it
was "transformative" and helped developers find security flaws.
Apple accused Corellium of essentially replicating iOS to create
"virtual" iOS-operated devices, whose "sole function" was to run
unauthorized copies of the system on non-Apple hardware.
But the Fort Lauderdale-based judge said Corellium "adds
something new to iOS" by letting users see and halt running
processes, take live snapshots, and conduct other operations.
"Corellium's profit motivation does not undermine its fair use
defense, particularly considering the public benefit of the
product," Smith wrote.
The judge also rejected Apple's argument that the Delray Beach
startup acted in bad faith by selling its product
indiscriminately, including potentially to hackers, and by not
requiring users to report bugs to Apple.
He said that argument appeared "puzzling, if not disingenuous,"
saying Cupertino, California-based Apple did not impose a
reporting requirement under its own Bug Bounty Program.
Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Corellium has denied wrongdoing. Justin Levine, one of its
lawyers, said in an email the decision made "proper findings in
connection with fair use."
Smith said Apple may still pursue a separate federal law claim
that Corellium circumvented its security measures when creating
its software.
Corellium was founded in Aug. 2017. According to court records,
Apple tried to buy Corellium starting in Jan. 2018, but talks
had broken down by summer. Apple sued Corellium in Aug. 2019.
The case is Apple Inc v. Corellium LLC, U.S. District Court,
Southern District of Florida, No. 19-81160.
(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by David
Gregorio)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|