| 
						Exclusive: Prudential eyes full control of China 
						venture, considers U.S. options
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [February 06, 2020]  By 
		Carolyn Cohn and Sinead Cruise 
 LONDON (Reuters) - Prudential <PRU.L> is in 
		talks that could lead to it taking full control of its 50:50 joint 
		venture with China's CITIC <0267.HK> and is considering selling some or 
		all of its U.S. business to sharpen its focus on Asia, a source told 
		Reuters.
 
 Changes in January to foreign ownership laws in China have made it 
		possible for the first time for the British life insurer to own all of 
		its CITIC joint venture, a landmark transaction which the source said 
		Prudential was working towards.
 
 Prudential has not made a formal application to increase its ownership 
		yet but is checking the plan would win approval from the Chinese 
		authorities before it submits an application, the source said.
 
 
		
		 
		Insiders at the $48 billion company say the deal could offer a boost to 
		China as it battles to minimize the economic impact of the coronavirus 
		outbreak that has disrupted travel to the country and put several cities 
		on lockdown.
 
 It would be hard to put a timescale on the approval process for a 
		possible transaction, the source said, adding that the Chinese 
		authorities were capable of acting fast to grant the necessary 
		permissions if CITIC was willing to sell.
 
 "They want foreign investment post-virus," the source said.
 
 Analysts at KBW said they expected Prudential to spend "a few billion" 
		dollars increasing their stake in the venture. The company no longer has 
		any British or European business after splitting off its M&G <MNG.L> 
		insurance and asset management unit last year.
 
 The growth of the middle class in Asian economies and the lack of state 
		retirement benefits have driven demand for private life and health 
		insurance.
 
 Many western insurers have joint ventures in China but the Prudential-CITIC 
		venture is among the largest, with around 20 provincial licenses.
 
 Chinese officials have become more welcoming of British and European 
		companies amid Beijing's trade tussle with the United States, the source 
		added.
 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			The logo of British life insurer Prudential is seen on their 
			building in London, Britain March 17, 2019. REUTERS/Simon 
			Dawson/File Photo 
            
			 
Insurance sales for Prudential's Chinese business rose 45% in the first half of 
2019, and the recent coronavirus outbreak is not seen having much direct impact, 
analysts said.
 Its shares have fallen by 1.5% so far this year but the insurer has low exposure 
to Wuhan, where the virus originated.
 
 Prudential, which sells insurance in China through 55,000 agents, is opening a 
technical center in Shenzhen, in mainland China, where hiring is cheaper than 
Hong Kong because the cost of living is lower.
 
 JACKSON FOR SALE
 
 In addition to the China plans, Prudential is looking at ways to reduce its 
ownership of its U.S. business Jackson.
 
 Analysts say there is little logic in Prudential holding onto the business, 
which has few synergies with its Asian arm.
 
 All options are on the table as Jackson seeks "outside capital", the source 
said, adding that the business was attracting interest from private equity 
firms, sovereign wealth funds and Canadian pension funds.
 
 Jackson had an operating profit of 1.9 billion pounds in 2018 compared with 2.2 
billion for Prudential's Asian business. New business sales for the United 
States totaled only 1.5 billion pounds compared with 3.7 billion in Asia.
 
 
A dilution of ownership in Jackson would leave the 170-year-old insurer, 
Britain's biggest, with the vast bulk of its operations in Asia, along with a 
smaller African business.
 (Editing by Edmund Blair)
 
				 
			[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |