| 
		Explainer: Nevada caucuses present new test to Democrats after chaotic 
		Iowa contest
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [February 18, 2020] 
		By Ginger Gibson 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nevada Democrats 
		will host hundreds of caucuses on Saturday, the third contest in the 
		state-by-state presidential nominating process, almost three weeks after 
		the Iowa caucuses caused mayhem when a technical meltdown delayed 
		results.
 
 The Democratic race has narrowed to eight candidates vying for their 
		party's nomination to challenge Republican President Donald Trump in the 
		Nov. 3 election.
 
 Even with the smaller field, the caucus system remains complicated and 
		presents more potential challenges to the party, which came under heavy 
		criticism when the Iowa vote went awry.
 
 After the contests in the states of Iowa and New Hampshire, where the 
		electorate is overwhelmingly white, Nevada is the first test with a 
		diverse population. Nearly one-third of voters in the Nevada Democratic 
		caucuses in 2016 were either black or Latino, according to entrance 
		polls.
 
 The western state represents a small slice of the nominating process, 
		however, with just 36 delegates out of a total of 3,979. https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-ELECTION-DELEGATE-TRACKER/0100B5DR3JT/index.html
 
 Here is how the Nevada caucuses work:
 
 IS CAUCUSING SIMILAR TO THAT OF IOWA?
 
 Like in Iowa, instead of heading to a polling site to cast their 
		ballots, Nevadans will conduct a series of caucus meetings across the 
		state to tally who they think should be their party's nominee.
 
 Nevada will hold caucus meetings at 250 locations for 1,736 precincts, 
		similar to the number of precincts in Iowa.
 
 In each caucus, voters will divide themselves up and sit or stand with 
		others supporting the same candidate. If there are enough like-minded 
		voters, their candidate gets a delegate, referred to as being "viable."
 
 Voters who pick a candidate who does not have enough support - often at 
		least 15% of those attending the caucus - will be forced to make a 
		second choice.
 
 They will have three options: back a candidate who is already viable, 
		combine forces with the supporters of another unviable candidate and 
		make that contender viable, or leave. That process is known as 
		"realignment."
 
 The meetings are held at the same time and are scheduled to begin at 12 
		p.m. PST on Saturday (2000 GMT).
 
		
		 
		
 WILL NEVADA USE THE SAME APP?
 
 Like Iowa, Nevada Democrats had planned to use a phone application to 
		submit the results of the caucuses to the state party.
 
 But after the app chaos in Iowa - which set off days of delay and 
		mistrust about the results - Nevada officials said they would not be 
		utilizing any applications developed by Shadow Inc, the tech company 
		used by Iowa Democrats.
 
 Both states designed extensive paper trails to back up electronic 
		tabulation, but Nevada is still relying heavily on technology. A 
		volunteer at each caucus site will use a tablet to check in voters and 
		then to calculate whether a candidate is viable.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
 
            That is partly because the voting in Nevada will be slightly more 
			complex than in Iowa. 
            HOW DOES ABSENTEE VOTING WORK?
 Nevada Democrats have designed a different system from Iowa to allow 
			for absentee voting, which could complicate the process of 
			tabulating support in individual caucuses.
 
 The use of caucuses has frequently been criticized for omitting 
			people who cannot vote in person at a set time, including people 
			without childcare or who do shift work. Nevada has a significant 
			number of shift workers because of its large casino and tourism 
			industries.
 
 This year, each state designed its own absentee process.
 
 In Iowa, voters had to physically attend absentee caucus meetings, 
			at different times or outside the state, and cast a vote in person.
 
             
			In Nevada, voters who cannot attend a caucus must complete a paper 
			ballot during the four-day early voting period. Those paper ballots 
			are then used at their precincts as if the voter were there 
			participating in person, with volunteers including their preferences 
			in tabulations.
 More than 26,000 people participated in the first two days of 
			absentee voting, Nevada officials said on Monday. About 84,000 
			voters participated in the last Democratic caucuses in Nevada in 
			2016.
 
 The process makes doing math in the caucus more complicated. Nevada 
			has therefore designed a special calculator application that will 
			allow the volunteers doing tabulations to enter the numbers and 
			determine the results.
 
 WHEN WILL WE KNOW A WINNER?
 
 The Iowa caucuses were completed the night of Feb. 3 but it was not 
			until late on Feb. 6 that all the results were reported publicly.
 
 Nevada is hoping to avoid such a drawn-out debacle.
 
 "We understand just how important it is that we get this right and 
			protect the integrity of Nevadans’ votes. We are confident in our 
			backup plans and redundancies," Nevada Democratic officials wrote to 
			campaigns last week.
 
 Nevada will not use an app to report its results to the state party. 
			Instead, volunteers will call a hotline to submit their results and 
			then use a digital backup system to verify their submissions.
 
 In Iowa, party officials circulated a phone number when the app 
			stopped working, but the phone lines became overrun and further 
			delayed the process. Nevada has not made public the phone number.
 
 If something does go wrong, Nevada Democrats assured campaigns that 
			the party "has provided a standard process for any presidential 
			candidate to request a prompt and accurate recount."
 
 (Reporting by Ginger Gibson; Editing by Mary Milliken and Peter 
			Cooney)
 
			[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  
			Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |