The
appeals court reversed a lower court decision that denied a
preliminary injunction against a law requiring voters to produce
a photo ID at the polls.
The ruling puts the voter ID law on hold until the underlying
lawsuit challenging it is decided, likely blocking it for the
November 2020 general election.
The law did include a provision allowing people without proper
ID to still vote, but the appeals court found the provision
burdensome and that the "discriminatory intent" of the law was
especially evident in those exceptions.
"Such a choice speaks more of an intention to target
African-American voters rather than a desire to comply with the
newly created Amendment in a fair and balanced manner," the
three-judge panel said in its 45-page ruling.
In December, a federal court issued a preliminary injunction
against the same voter ID law, finding that it was at least
partially motivated by an attempt to discriminate against
certain voters in violation of their rights to equal protection
under the law as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
But the state appeals court found it was justified in claiming
jurisdiction over the issue.
The appeals court then reversed another three-judge panel in the
lower Wake County Superior Court, which had allowed the voter ID
law to remain in effect pending trial.
Republican-led legislatures in several states have passed
similar voter ID laws, arguing they are needed to prevent voter
fraud.
But critics including Democrats and voting rights advocates call
the laws an effective way to attempt to suppress votes from
African Americans, who are both more likely to vote Democratic
and lack the needed identity cards.
"Extensive research reveals that fraud is very rare (and) voter
impersonation is virtually nonexistent," the Brennan Center for
Justice, which bills itself as a nonpartisan law and policy
institute, says in its ongoing voter fraud project.
The law in question originated from a 2018 ballot initiative
passed by voters to require photo ID before balloting. The
initiative also assigned to the state legislature the task of
writing a law detailing the requirements.
After the Republican-led legislature passed such a law, Senate
Bill 824, Democratic governor Roy Cooper vetoed it, only to have
his veto overridden.
(Reporting by Daniel Trotta; Editing by Andrea Ricci)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content.
|
|