Wells Fargo to pay $3 billion to U.S., admits pressuring
workers in fake-accounts scandal
Send a link to a friend
[February 22, 2020] By
Chris Prentice, Pete Schroeder and Imani Moise
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Wells Fargo & Co <WFC.N> has agreed to pay $3
billion to resolve criminal and civil probes into fraudulent sales
practices and has admitted to pressuring employees in a fake-accounts
scandal, U.S. officials said on Friday, wrapping up one of the last
major investigations looming over the bank.
Wells Fargo will pay the penalties to the U.S. Justice Department and
Securities and Exchange Commission and enter into a three-year deferred
prosecution agreement during which the San Francisco-based bank will
continue to cooperate with any ongoing government investigations,
Justice Department officials said.
As part of the deal, Wells Fargo admitted that between 2002 and 2016 it
pressured employees to meet "unrealistic sales goals that led thousands
of employees to provide millions of accounts or products to customers
under false pretenses or without consent, often by creating false
records or misusing customers' identities," the department said in a
statement.
In a statement, Charles Scharf, Wells Fargo's new chief executive,
described the past conduct as "reprehensible." Wells Fargo is the
fourth-largest U.S. lender.
"This case illustrates a complete failure of leadership at multiple
levels within the bank. Simply put, Wells Fargo traded its hard-earned
reputation for short-term profits, and harmed untold numbers of
customers along the way," Nick Hanna, U.S. attorney for the Central
District of California, said in a statement.
Top managers within Wells Fargo's Community Bank division were aware of
the "unlawful and unethical" practices as early as 2002, and many of the
practices were referred to as "gaming" within the bank, the Justice
Department said.
The agreement resolves the civil and criminal liability regarding Wells
Fargo's fake-accounts scandal.
About $500 million of the penalties will go to the SEC to be distributed
to investors to settle charges that the bank committed fraud by
misleading investors about its sales practices, an SEC official said on
a call with reporters about the resolutions settlement.
Settling the multi-agency investigation marked an important milestone
for Scharf, who joined the company from BNY Mellon in September shortly
after the third anniversary of the scandal.
"We are committing all necessary resources to ensure that nothing like
this happens again, while also driving Wells Fargo forward," Scharf
said.
'GHOST IN A MACHINE'
Watchdog group Public Citizen criticized the deal, saying it does not go
far enough.
[to top of second column] |
A Wells Fargo bank
sign is pictured in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S. August
10, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake
"Any resolution for Wells Fargo's massive, management-directed misconduct must
hold individuals to account. We know many of the crimes, and we know that real
executives, not some ghost in a machine, committed them," said Bartlett Naylor,
a financial policy advocate with the Washington-based group.
The deal does not preclude civil or criminal charges against individuals,
Justice Department officials told reporters.
U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren, who is seeking the Democratic nomination to
challenge Republican President Donald Trump in the Nov. 3 election, wrote on
Twitter, "This is a small step in the right direction, but it's not a substitute
for holding senior executives individually accountable - and bringing criminal
charges against them if the evidence justifies it."
The probe examined activities in Wells Fargo's community bank unit, with Justice
Department citing pressure coming from the division's leadership.
In a rare move last month, a U.S. bank regulator charged several former Wells
Fargo executives for their roles in the scandal. That included a settlement with
former CEO John Stumpf and civil charges against Carrie Tolstedt, former head of
the community bank unit.
"Ms. Tolstedt acted appropriately and in good faith at all times, and the effort
to scapegoat her is both unfair and unfounded," her lawyer Enu Mainigi said on
Friday.
The Justice Department inquiry was seen by analysts and investors as a key
hurdle the bank had to clear before it could focus on its growth strategy, which
includes convincing the Federal Reserve to remove an unprecedented growth
restriction placed on Wells Fargo's balance sheet until it proves it has fixed
its risk management and controls.
Wells Fargo had already paid out more than $4 billion in fines and penalties
related to the scandal since 2016. Internal and external probes have uncovered
issues in each of Wells Fargo's major business lines, including wealth
management and the commercial bank.
The U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee is scheduled to
hold three hearings on Wells Fargo's conduct next month.
Over the past three years, Wells Fargo has taken various steps to fix its issues
and rebuild trust with customers, investors and regulators. They include changes
to its board, centralizing risk teams and hiring an external chief executive.
However, ongoing reputation issues and unresolved legal matters have weighed on
the bank's stock price and profitability, which have lagged peers since 2016.
(Reporting by Chris Prentice and Pete Schroeder in Washington and Imani Moise
and Karen Freifeld in New York; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |