Julian Assange put lives at risk, lawyer for United States says
Send a link to a friend
[February 24, 2020]
By Michael Holden
LONDON (Reuters) - Julian Assange is wanted
for crimes that put at risk the lives of people in Iraq, Iran and
Afghanistan who had helped the West, said a lawyer acting for the United
States in its bid to extradite the 48-year-old.
Almost a decade since his WikiLeaks website enraged Washington by
leaking secret U.S. documents, a clean-shaven Assange appeared before an
extradition hearing at London's Woolwich Crown Court to confirm his name
and age.
Judge Vanessa Baraitser, speaking above chanting of "free Julian Assange"
from his supporters outside, cautioned that anyone causing a disturbance
would be removed. She said the chanting would not help Assange's case.
The United States' lawyer, James Lewis, told the court that Assange
should be extradited to stand trial for crimes including hacking, and
for disseminating unredacted material which had put at risk the lives of
informants, journalists, dissidents and others in Iraq, Iran and
Afghanistan.
The United States asked Britain to extradite Assange last year after he
was pulled from the Ecuador embassy in London, where he had spent seven
years holed up avoiding extradition to Sweden over sex crime allegations
which have since been dropped. Assange has served a sentence in Britain
for skipping bail and remains jailed pending the U.S. extradition
request.
Lewis sought to make clear that Assange was not wanted because he had
embarrassed the United States but because he had broken the law and put
lives at risk.
"I would remind the court that these were individuals who were passing
on information from Iraq, Afghanistan and Iran," Lewis said. Hundreds of
people across the world had to be warned after the WikiLeaks disclosures
and some had to be relocated from their countries, he added.
"Some sources identified by WikiLeaks ... subsequently disappeared," he
said, although he added U.S. authorities could not prove that was a
result of WikiLeaks' action.
Jennifer Robinson, Assange's lawyer, has said his case could lead to
criminalising activities crucial to investigative journalists and his
work has shed an unprecedented light on how the United States conducted
its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"We are talking about collateral murder, evidence of war crimes," she
said last week. "They are a remarkable resource for those of us seeking
to hold governments to account for abuses."
[to top of second column]
|
A woman wears a face mask with a hashtag of support for WikiLeaks
founder Julian Assange outside Woolwich Crown Court, ahead of a
hearing to decide whether Assange should be extradited to the United
States, in London, Britain, February 24, 2020. REUTERS/Hannah Mckay
HERO OR ENEMY?
Assange is wanted by the United States on 18 criminal counts of
conspiring to hack government computers and violating an espionage
law, and could spend decades in prison if convicted.
Lewis said Assange had conspired with Chelsea Manning, then an
American soldier known as Bradley Manning, to hack Department of
Defense computers. He said the defense was exaggerating when it said
Assange might receive a U.S. jail term of 170 years.
Dressed in a blue-grey suit, Assange sat in the dock and studied
legal papers.
A hero to admirers who say he has exposed abuses of power, Assange
is cast by critics as a threat to Western security. He says the
extradition is politically motivated by those embarrassed by his
revelations.
In addition to releasing military records, WikiLeaks angered
Washington by publishing secret U.S. diplomatic cables that laid
bare critical U.S. appraisals of world leaders. Assange made
headlines in 2010 when WikiLeaks published a classified U.S.
military video showing a 2007 U.S. helicopter strike in Baghdad that
killed a dozen people, including two Reuters news staff.
Since he fell foul of the United States, he has always feared ending
up on trial there.
The hearing will not decide if Assange is guilty of any wrongdoing,
but whether the extradition request meets the requirements set out
under a 2003 UK-U.S. treaty, which critics say is stacked in
Washington's favor.
The case will get under way before being postponed until May 18,
when it will resume again for a further three weeks to allow both
sides more time to gather evidence.
(Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Peter Graff)
[© 2020 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2020 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Thompson Reuters is solely responsible for this content. |